The data generated by China is just too much and especially when they are also applying the technology. Most of the other countries are hesitant towards doing some of the more extreme things that they do. I think AI can be either good or bad depending on who develops it. But I completely agree that China is in the lead. In fact, I have heard that they are allowing their allies to use their technology (which means more data) so it does come down to who has enough data to train their algorithms.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
China is one bomb on their major dam away from being destroyed.
I would not worry about them.
China has many issues right now. Internal conflict, food shortage (floods destroyed their crops), the virus rampaging (signified by their lockdowns of areas), energy shortage (ban on coal) and many more. I think right now they are only focused on trying to survive. And one of the way it is trying to survive is to control their citizens (ethics aside) so I believe AI will be more rampant in China.
About the dam, I believe while it will not survive for too long but it will take at least a few years because of the way it was built (money stolen through corruption).
Don't forget extreme pollution that has long term consequences that at the moment no one cares about or they can't afford to care about.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
You are presuming the training of AI in the future is still going to require a large amount of data.
All indications are that we will see a new paradigm emerge that requires a lot less data.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta