I'm sorry to be that blunt, but we're all here for the money, aren't we. Delegating to @leo.voter gives you the return of ~16%. HP delegation gives you 0% of direct return (apart from hive inflation and share of curation rewards(?)). Of course there's going to be indirect return of such delegation of increasing LBI token value and dividends.
Is this beneficial enough to delegate? I humbly disagree with that.
I think it would be better to let @lbi-token hold some of HP earned and not to send everything to @leo.voter
We may agree that from now on 50% of HP income should be delegated or agree that LBI should accumulate, let's say, 1k HP for now and the excess will be delegated as earlier (I bear in mind current delegations that @lbi-token already has received).
Depending 100% on delegations may be risky - there's a scenario when big delegators drop the project creating issues. So it's a matter of diversification and making the project more stable thus more likely to succeed.
I know, the LBI is focused on Leo and Hive is experiencing All Time Lows, but we're all here for long term also. It would be nice to have some second leg supporting the project with Hive Power.
This may also provide useful in a scenario where the Hive rates go significantly go up - if @lbi-token holds some hive it may use this situation.