I am not against AI for research or proofreading purposes but when your whole thing is ai generated then you're nothing but a plagiarist to me. Copy pasting ai generated content is not content creation.
Think it's okay. Maybe as I am created by the "ai" of people. Seems to be a divide between support and against. So seems best as a tool and not simply by itself.
I personally don't have a problem with it
I still haven't even looked at any AI apps, but I should know better. Anytime in my life, people 'slept' on new tech, they lost.
It is the future. To believe we are not going to see AI with text and images is sticking our heads in the sand.
Agreed. I plan to look into it very soon, but still haven't even signed up to chatgpt lolol
plagiarism
lots of people think that way for sure. i see the conflict
I am not against AI for research or proofreading purposes but when your whole thing is ai generated then you're nothing but a plagiarist to me. Copy pasting ai generated content is not content creation.
The dual problem again … it’s a tool that can be used constructively or destructively … ¯_(ツ)_/¯
That's a great way to look at it for sure.
Think it's okay. Maybe as I am created by the "ai" of people. Seems to be a divide between support and against. So seems best as a tool and not simply by itself.
No problem, as long as the poster actually understands the subject and the output is checked for accuracy.
Using AI doesn't mean what it generates is always 'facts' or that the subject matter is viable.