Very revealing. You basically spoke of something and I want to agree with you and that is the fact that there won't be a limitation of a consumer being just a consumer and the produce that being just the one who gives while a consumer takes.
In the new economy this rigid structure will be bendable, if anyone can easily switch between being a giver and a taker it means limitations will be broken and both producer or consumer you have the choices to become more thereby increasing the possibilities of even have more.
With tokenization, people control what they get even more.
If you look at the world of music, science , social media and al, there is this disparity of a producer tending to get more, while the consumer becomes the audience that only has to consume what is served him getting, nothing in return, this twist would be changed by tokenization
Freer, better, smarter and compact
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
It also can be extended to automation. We see a lot of automation in the hands of a few. There is no reason why this cannot be tokenized to allow for many more people to share in.
For example, how about automated market makers that have thousands (or even millions) sharing in. Robotic automation that an entire community has a piece of. Or energy development with fractional ownership pieces spread across the globe.
These are all future possibilities if people are willing to tokenize what they (or their assets) produce.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I guess we'd have entities that'll counter tokenization because it threatens their hold and their control, the automation in the hands of a few can be further broken down and the more broken the more accessible to anyone to build something for themselves without any sort of dependence
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Yes and then factor in NFTs which will tokenize individual items that are not liquid.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta