Good question. I've long wondered how the value relation to HP was derived for the RCs currently. That also raises another interesting question, if there was a major bull market in terms of HIVE adoption, what would stop the developers from simply re-valuing the RCs to a cheaper rate so things don't get bogged down from all the activity?
I was thinking about linking somehow the RC costs with the amount of Liquid HIVE in the exchanges.
So, if the amount of Liquid Hive is high then the RC cost should also be high and the contrary.
That would increase the demand for HP, so the price would rise and the RC cost would reduce.
yes
Good question. I've long wondered how the value relation to HP was derived for the RCs currently. That also raises another interesting question, if there was a major bull market in terms of HIVE adoption, what would stop the developers from simply re-valuing the RCs to a cheaper rate so things don't get bogged down from all the activity?
I was thinking about linking somehow the RC costs with the amount of Liquid HIVE in the exchanges.
So, if the amount of Liquid Hive is high then the RC cost should also be high and the contrary.
That would increase the demand for HP, so the price would rise and the RC cost would reduce.