I'll put a pin in it for now, i made a simular set up for another pool that i own completely, if i don't see any result i'll just leave it, else i maybe try, but then u would need to check my recent support ticket to get my LEO unstaked
Seems my idea may be faulty, thought that having it paired with another token that could move the price, would benefit the Arbitrum side price and more cross chain swaps would happen, from what i have read it's not that way
Maybe want to try something, not sure yet, but it would involve another pool with LEO
I’m not of the opinion that more pools is better. Fragmented liquidity isn’t really a great thing
Wouldn't be many more pools, just 1 against a more volatile coin and not that big also, would just be me probably
you can try, wouldn’t recommend though
wouldn't that create more price difference and get more volume to balance that out?
not across chains - it’s much better to have 1 pool per chain
For example: you want price discrepancy from Arbitrum to BSC
Having same chain arbitrage is 1/100th as profitable and crosschain arb
I think same chain pools will only cannibalize profits from other chain pools
I'll put a pin in it for now, i made a simular set up for another pool that i own completely, if i don't see any result i'll just leave it, else i maybe try, but then u would need to check my recent support ticket to get my LEO unstaked
Seems my idea may be faulty, thought that having it paired with another token that could move the price, would benefit the Arbitrum side price and more cross chain swaps would happen, from what i have read it's not that way