Another example of why $LEO tokenomics need to change
The change will bring fresh capital into our ecosystem and immediately cut off outflows through inflationary rewards
Time for deflation + new investors + revenue buybacks
Another example of why $LEO tokenomics need to change
The change will bring fresh capital into our ecosystem and immediately cut off outflows through inflationary rewards
Time for deflation + new investors + revenue buybacks
I hope you get to bring it on soon and let us put our LEO in rest.
I support this.
However it feels like if LeoDex is taking all the fees for 4 months.
Then I will sit on my Leo on InLeo until closer to the 4 months is over and then move half of it over.
Timing will be important here.
I think taking the fees would be a bad way to put it
It’s 100% buy pressure on LEO to fill Protocol Owned LEO. Then flips off after “4months” and switches to USDC distribution
But yes, the APR for holding LEO will only exist on INLEO until that “4 month” period is over
agreed.
sorry bad wording.
You're good!
There's just a lot of sensitivity around much of this stuff so I'm trying to be crystal clear
If you do this, you must do absolutly seamless bridge LEO<->arb.LEO idelly with zero fees (or nearly zero - like 0.05%). Because otherwise Inleo is doomed...
The higher the fee, the more that LEO gets burned
So it hurts people who bridge LEO but helps people who hold LEO for bridge fees to be high
I will focus on helping the people who hold, not the people who bridge & sell
;)
OK, fair point. But what about those who don’t want to sell but want USDC via staking arb.LEO on Leodex? Fees may not be as low as I said, but not around 1% like on wLEO.io. I think fees at levels as affiliate fees on Leodex might be OK...