leo.voter votes are extra and delegations are fed by the SIRP
As a premium user, you're feeding the SIRP
As a non-premium user, you're earning from the SIRP
If you're not contributing to the SIRP but are earning from it, you are an active draw from it. This is not inherently a bad thing but logic dictates that perhaps your rewards should not be AS LARGE as someone who is actively contributing to it
LEO 2.0 is about creating a closed feedback loop. Closing the loop means that active contributors earn more than people just earning
We are not hating on non-premiums (hating on them would mean that we're doing something negative - like downvoting to ensure their rewards are earned ONLY by premium users). We are simply ensuring active contributors earn more
Doesn't it make sense to reward people who contribute More than people who don't?
I understand that rewarding contributors is much important, but think of InLeo as a frontend of Hive where 1000s of user make visit to earn LEO tokens, if they don't get something from Leo.voter a nice upvote for contribution, why would ..
why would they visit inleo and waste time for petty vote rather moving to other Hive frontends and enjoy at leat Hive HBD rewards.
I see it detrimental to InLeo economy if you completely remove votes for non-premium users.
You should be flexible and make a fair trade, 0 emissions does not mean you put away free users and do not reward them they provide traffic that promotes inleo indirectly on web2.
And when users visit InLeo they know about LeoDEX too. You can reduce the upvote percentage but keep it active for all users here. This way when users see the difference in rewards they'll sure think of buying premium subscription.
Take the premium graph you see it is already declining, only those who can afford buy regularly in most cases.