The #1 doubt that Michael Saylor's Strategy has in the market is that the business is cash flow negative
This means they lose money every day they operate. We believe they are a healthy, strong business
But this commenter is right: if Strategy generated Revenue then a lot of the detractors wouldn't have a leg to stand on
This is why LeoStrategy so proudly focuses on generating revenue
Generating revenue each day through our Market Makers is the key to the long-term sustainability of our strategy. We have 5 major market makers live right now with more on the way:
- LEO CrossChain MM
- LSTR CrossChain MM
- SURGE CrossChain MM
- TTSLA CrossChain MM
- Hive-Engine Market Maker
- TGLD CrossChain MM (Launching on November 24th post-presale)
- HE Order Book <> CrossChain MM (NEW! Launching ~November 27th)
These 5 (LIVE) and soon-to-be 7 MMs create daily profits for the fund. Cash Flow is King.
I just finished listening to a Michael Saylor interview. It's pretty god dang genius what he's doing!
But yeah I think the doubters would jump in the deep end no questions asked if the company was also making money!
@askrafiki how does Micro Strategy stay afloat if they're not making money?
The interview with Grant is it? Yeah, i think Saylor’s strategy is bold. Profitability would silence doubters fast.
Yeah that's the one.
MicroStrategy stays afloat primarily by raising capital through convertible debt offerings and at-the-market equity sales (like selling shares), which they use to buy more Bitcoin as their core treasury asset. Since their software business generates modest revenue, they rely on BTC's price appreciation to grow their holdings' value, effectively using it as collateral for more borrowing—similar to a leveraged bet on crypto. This has worked amid BTC rallies, but critics worry about rising debt (over $4B now) and interest payments if prices stall. For contrast, LeoStrategy flips this by generating actual profits via market makers to buy and stake LEO without going cash flow negative.