One of the most powerful love songs of all time, created by a lovelorn Clapton with a powerful cast of musicians that only briefly stayed together. #music #ericclapton #layla
I don't know how your schedules are but I suggest you engage more in the community. Support other creator's contents and I tell you, you'll get more support.
Try following curation trails too, that way your HP is working for you and you earn curator's rewards even when you're busy offline.
Lastly, try participating in some other community's contests. Most of them come with rewards for the winners. Again, that would help you gain visibility.
In summary, show up more, blog more and engage more.
I don't know if you're aware of Hive Echo contests. It's another way to earn some few cents too.
I can tag you on the post if you want
Oh ok. That’s a little different but I would still say prioritizes not ensures. I got some donut ($0) long form posts too.
Also, I will say that there are likely MANY metrics and considerations being tracked when it comes to getting votes that we don’t see. AI makes tracking this stuff easy.
Here’s an example to put things in perspective: what is the ratio between the lifetime LEO earnings of the user compared to the LEO Power of the user? FYI this isn’t any shade @sirfx, just giving a neutral outside perspective to explain what type of data might be working against you.
And again that’s just an example. Could be entirely something else all together. I just want to emphasize there’s likely safeguards for value extraction we don’t know about.
it’s like that sometimes. Votes aren’t guaranteed.
Dont “feel bad”…just find your lane.
Here’s some tips that should help though:
be GENUINELY active during all AMAs
comment on others posts 4x more than u post yourself
I see you talk about the market but I don’t see much of your personal experience in the market like screen shots, past experiences, etc. That would help.
I have to confess that it's been a struggle uploading photos on threads. Sometimes I try close to 5 times just to upload a single photo. Like this one uploaded on the 3rd attempt. I don't know why it's so.
By the way, it's been a while since I earned this much $LEO
Nice.
How your highlighted statements mach with the fact, that I (@onealfa) have not received even 1 penny of my weekly SURGE YIELD on 09.29 ?
Ppl say to me this could happen because all my 36000 SURGE where on the HE sell order on the day of snapshot (I had to put them on sale at a very high price, just to have them not be visible on the rich-list) Is this true? If this is true - when and WHERE it was published , that SURGE coins which are on salesorder on the day of SNAPSHOT - are NOT eligible for receiving YIELD for that whole week ???
Feels like someone steel my $100.
Please put more light on this.
Where are the complete rules for receiving #surge YIELDS.
( It looks to me rather shady at the moment)
This has been one of my primary criticisms of LeoStrategy. The communications need to be more precise and fundamental information should be in a single location.
In your case hype and marketing speak has objectively conflicted with observable reality.
Someone said something about this few days, and asked exactly same question. @Leostrategy need to explain how the dividend payout works. I made a thread about this issue because the same thing will affect many people after SURGE presale.
I also have the same question to @leostrategy as I also faced the similar issue. I have done it for experiment purpose only that cost me some cents but your amount was huge. I hope leostrategy will give a satisfactory answer of it.
I also set a sell order at a high price, as Onealfa did. I didn't want to sell my SURGE, as I said that it was for experimental purposes.
Should I get dividends?
I think I just want to know the answer. If LeoStrategy says that I don't deserve it, I just want to know about it officially, as it didn't mention it in any post (I am sorry if I missed a post where it was mentioned). That's all.
You won't get any answer to that. You get no info from Khal. It works on the basis of hearsay. He thinks, that everybody thinks and knows everything exactly the same as him... That we are in his brain...
In the introducing SURGE post, @leostrategy stated - that holders with SURGE in LPs would receive the weekly yield payment, by extension @onealfa should have a reasonable expectation to be paid yield for SURGE he owned but that was listed on market.
It is different but your assertion was "If you’re selling should you get dividends?" SURGE in an LP is offered for sale. So the premise in your question isn't supported by Leostrategy's public communications.
OneAlfa listed his SURGE at 19.99 Hive per Surge...
I have just NO idea, should I get them, or should I not. Maybe yes, maybe not.
It should be a clear, firmly expresses RULES, where it is stated what happens in such situations. RULES, published openly, in an easy accesable format ( not perhaps a few live words, a phrase, said in one of the AMA's.)
Afterall, I will honor a clear and firm answer from the token creator(s), not the comments, guesses and assumptions from other INLEO users.
That was the whole idea om my initial threadpost.
If such rules been published ( when and where?) - I will say sorry, and will live quitley with this $103.85 loss ( just as with one of many other "fools fees")
BTW, Selling is not the same as SOLD. Sales order means - I am still owning them. Tokens are Not sold yet.
Besides all the above said - I wonder why @surge.yield bot still replies to me, that my last weekly yield was $103.850 ? Another factor, increasing missunderstandings.
..you are not the owner of the tokens if they are in a sell order
I tend to disagree with this line.
How I am not the owner, if I can do what ever I want until the order is filled in?
A can cancel it any time.
I can (once it canceled) sell, donate, burn, loan those tokens at my sole, exclusive own wish, no permissions asked. No other requirements needed.
The only moment when I really stop being the owner - is the moment when the oder gets filled in. And tokens are SOLD.
You will have a hard time convince me the oposit.
P.S.
OK, lets assume some of my coins are in an open sell order on the order book, on HE.
Now, Name me please ( exactly) - WHO OWNS THEM at that particular moment. (until the order is either filled in, or canceled)
Please. Thank you.
If you don’t hold tokens, you don’t get dividends. How is that hard to understand?
LP means you hold LP tokens. You’ll get paid for 50% of the size of your LP (since you hold a claim on 50% surge in the LP)
If you hold SURGE in your wallet, you get 100% dividends because you hold surge in your wallet
If you have a sell order for your surge, you don’t hold that SURGE nor do you hold LP tokens. You are creating net negative impacts on the economy
If LSTR required you to stake your SURGE, you would not get paid yield if you held it in a sell order, would you?
Their blog posts are very clear on this. People asking for it to be different are feeling a high degree of entitlement. That’d be like asking for USDC if you held LEO liquid on LeoDex vs sLEO
I don't have a huge problem with it per se. My pushback was due to the fact that this isn't the way it works with stocks and that is what I expected--not entitlement.
If I hold a stock that pays a dividend and put it up for limit order sale, then I receive dividends on that stock until it sells. I assumed the same here.
The new post explains it well, but I have gone back and read the original post several times and see no clear (to me anyways) indication that this is how it was.
They do say holders, but my initial understanding is that I am a holder until sold. If I put in a limit order then it is not sold until--well it is sold. I understand it is not in my wallet, but I still control that token as I can rescind the sell order at any time.
I was not selling anytime soon, so it didn't really matter to me. I can see why people could be confused and believe "logically" that it's yours until it is sold.
Glad it's all cleared up though. Really, it just needed clarity. 😀
A sell order means I hold nothing in my wallet. Correct.
Are they actually in any wallet? I don't know the answer to that one. Maybe I should.
But I still OWN them. My active key controls their fate supposedly and have set conditions under which that can happen.
Who else owns them?
The future buyer certainly does not.
The exchange could take them--I guess, but do they own them? And if they did take them could I sue them and win? And if the exchange does own them, shouldn't they get the dividends?
I don't know why this issue has irritated me so much. I have not and do not plan on selling mine. It just doesn't set right with me and I don't feel that this was clear up front and everyone is acting like it was so clear.
I think perhaps it's just not intuitive to people that just because you are selling something means you are no longer holding it. In real life, you hold it until you get paid.
Good morning! 🌞 Wishing you a bright, positive, and productive day ahead. May everything you do today bring you closer to your goals—have a great day! 🌟
We like the open discussion we've been seeing about SURGE Yield
Our blog post today offers a refresher course in how SURGE Yield is calculated and paid out which dives deeper into the mechanics than our original posts did
TLDR;
The original SURGE design required staking. You could either stake your SURGE or stake your SURGE:USDC LP Tokens. The only way to earn yield was to stake
We instead opted for a liquid staking design: this still requires that you either hold liquid SURGE in your actual wallet OR hold it inside an LP. SURGE held anywhere else does not count toward "SURGE in your wallet"
The snapshot window system we built prevents abuse which can come in many forms that we have predicted and built @surge.yield to prevent against: things like sell order attacks, switching accounts, buying and dumping after the payout window, etc. have all been proactively defended against
SURGE Is a perpetual preferred tokenized share of LSTR. Let's break each word of this sentence down:
Perpetual because SURGE's yield never ends. If you hold it forever, you get paid yield until you convert it to LSTR
Tokenized because it is a token on a blockchain(s)
Preferred because it lives at the top of the preference stack. This means that 1 SURGE = $1 no matter what. In the unlikely event of the LeoStrategy fund dissolving, SURGE holders get paid back FIRST and FOREMOST at the stated value of $1 per SURGE. This creates a floor price for SURGE at $1 (but no capped upside - SURGE can trade at $2, $3 or even $30 based on the LSTR price appreciating)
In short, SURGE is a convertible note on the LSTR token. 1 SURGE = 0.02 LSTR and this means that as LSTR's price rises, SURGE's price rises as well.
ARBISCAN balancecheck-tool shows I still have 0.436 arbi-LEO left in my wallet.
However, on LEODEX, where ever I go, it shows me I have 0.000 LEO.
Who knows, is this an intentional feature? Or just a simple BUG?
#feedback
yes we do.
I am working on the back-ends.
I can't actually post about crypto on X right now as it affects our game launches as the game industry is super anti-crypto right now after all the rug pulls etc....
The good thing is that we have the option to earn both sides where on LeoDex we earn a difference currency we can use to purchase other tokens and on InLeo, we continue to earn more LEO from our curation.
The future will be greater as the trading volume on LeoDex increases.
If you have SURGE in a sell order, you don’t get dividends for those SURGE
This makes perfect sense to me. LeoStrategy pays yield without requiring staking
If they did require staking, then you obviously wouldn’t earn anything if you have a sell order
You can LP your SURGE and still get yield according to their blog post. This is logical as providing LP is a net benefit to the economy but selling your SURGE is a net negative
If I have a sell order on a stock, AFAIK I get dividends until it sells. Seems more logical to require stake for dividends than this hybrid approach. Im not selling so I dont have a personal stake (See what I did there?) just an observation
People are different. What seems logical to one person, may look ilogic for other. That is why games are played by a RULES, not by logic assumptions.
The whole point of my post was - asking a clear & firm confirmation from a token founder, if assumptions from other Inleo participants, given to me , were RIGHT, or not
It wasn't for you post that I said that though, it was for someone else yesterday who complained about not getting dividend payout for his SURGE that were in a sell order.
And khal made a thread about it that SURGE in a sell order cannot get dividend payout. That was where I made this reply you are responding to. Moreover, I believe that khal know more about the inside and out of Leostrategy to make the thread. No offense please!
If you put 1000 tokens in a seller order at $100 per SURGE on an order book, are your tokens being used for anything productive?
If you put 1000 tokens in an LP, you have to match it with 1000 USDC. You are actually investing MORE to hold that LP position (using exogenous capital). Then your paired 1000+1000 are being used to provide instantaneous market liquidity which is a net benefit to the system
If I buy 1000 $SURGE and just let them sit in my wallet are they doing anything productive outside of providing the initial capital? NO
In my opinion, if I buy 1000 $surge and put a sell limit order for $100, then I have provided exactly the same benefit as someone who just lets them sit in the wallet. CAPITAL And I have provided liquidity to the market, just to the downside.
We just fixed our Tokenomics few months ago. We cannot get ourselves back into bad incentives. Those who already have sell orders are weak hands. Rewards should flow to the strongest hands.
I'm delta-neutral farming perp dexes at the moment. I think that's the name of the game these days. Small losses on fees, will see if it's worth it in the end...
Yeah, I've noticed! 😬 Gonna make some real trades here and there to try to cover those costs... And actually, it's not the funding fees (cos I don't keep those trades open for that long), but the opening fees moreover.
100%. People farming that like crazy. Definitely interesting to whether people will stay after their airdrop is done. Hyperliquid has already established themselves as something people will keep on using.
Cool Fallout poster, been waiting for this second season.... seems like lots of new characters coming up, who is that green guy fighting the knight?
#skiptvads, #tvonleo, #fallout, #lucy
Erica Alexander en American Fiction representa todo lo que necesitamos en una pareja, alguien que te confronte cuando estas siendo idiota pero que también te apoye, su línea sobre que no poder relacionarse con la gente no es medalla de honor es perfecta
#ericaalexander, #americanfiction, #relaciones, #confrontacion, #sabiduria
Ceballos tuvo un partido decente y Guler tambien mostro cosas interesantes en ataque aunque para mi gusto Ceballos no estuvo tan participativo como deberia, igual se nota que estos jugadores pueden aportar en el sistema que quiere implementar Xabi pero necesitan ser más consistentes en los partidos importantes
Brahim marco el quinto gol en los ultimos segundos del partido para cerrar la goleada con un 5 a 0 que pudo ser más abultado, el español entro desde el banquillo y aprovecho su oportunidad demostrando que tiene nivel para aportar cuando Xabi Alonso lo necesita durante la temporada
Jurassic World Rebirth llega a Peacock el 30 de octubre justo para Halloween después de haber dominado la taquilla, la película superó a Superman y a The Fantastic Four, Scarlett Johansson es la protagonista como Zora Bennett en una misión para recolectar material genético de tres criaturas gigantes, ya hay rumores de que Universal está trabajando en una secuela con Johansson regresando
#jurassicworldrebirth, #peacock, #scarlettjohansson, #taquilla, #secuela
Today, I'm getting a cashier's check to get repairs started on my car at the collision repair shop. It's gonna be iffy. There's a chance the insurance company might consider it a loss. But we won't know until they start working on it.
One of the most powerful love songs of all time, created by a lovelorn Clapton with a powerful cast of musicians that only briefly stayed together. #music #ericclapton #layla
!vote
Whatchu think ?
#hive #art #surge #waiv #leofinance
!DOOK
!BBH
!LOLZ
lolztoken.com
You need someone to fix their air conditioner.
Credit: reddit
@wealthgrammy, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of luchyl
(1/4)
😂😂😂😂💔💔💔
🫶🏻
Have not been receiving support on my post, It feels bad. just wondering how I will renew my premium when it expires.
Just voted on your last 3 posts, hope it helps! 👊
Thanks man!
But @leo.voter always ensure to vote posts created using the Inleo front end.
But it's not so in your own case. I wonder why.
I hope you get support soon so you don't feel discouraged.
!BBH
It is well!
I don't know how your schedules are but I suggest you engage more in the community. Support other creator's contents and I tell you, you'll get more support.
Try following curation trails too, that way your HP is working for you and you earn curator's rewards even when you're busy offline.
Lastly, try participating in some other community's contests. Most of them come with rewards for the winners. Again, that would help you gain visibility.
In summary, show up more, blog more and engage more.
I don't know if you're aware of Hive Echo contests. It's another way to earn some few cents too.
I can tag you on the post if you want
I appreciate
I would say Leo.voter “prioritizes” posts made on the front end, not ensures. Ensures sounds like a guarantee.
I own thousands of Leo and delegate a bunch and still some of my threads don’t get upvoted.
Okay, but why prioritize when it's said that as a premium user, you get support for your posts from leovoter
But your long form posts do get upvoted because that's what he's talking about not threads.?
Maybe I need some enlightening here. 🤔
Oh ok. That’s a little different but I would still say prioritizes not ensures. I got some donut ($0) long form posts too.
Also, I will say that there are likely MANY metrics and considerations being tracked when it comes to getting votes that we don’t see. AI makes tracking this stuff easy.
Here’s an example to put things in perspective: what is the ratio between the lifetime LEO earnings of the user compared to the LEO Power of the user? FYI this isn’t any shade @sirfx, just giving a neutral outside perspective to explain what type of data might be working against you.
And again that’s just an example. Could be entirely something else all together. I just want to emphasize there’s likely safeguards for value extraction we don’t know about.
it’s like that sometimes. Votes aren’t guaranteed.
Dont “feel bad”…just find your lane.
Here’s some tips that should help though:
our new game store opened in Colorado you can find us on instagram at : crystalspidertcg - DM us if you have any collections for sell.
Our website will be live soon and we are opening additional locations in Las Vegas and Daytona Beach.
Followed on IG 👍
gave you a follow on Instagram. I never get on there but still good to have followed.
let’s go. I need to get an order together. Maybe for Christmas.
Going home in less than 5 minutes. Date night. May not see you all till my morning :) Have a good one ;)
remember to take breaks and drink plenty water
😂. !vote
lol, I sure did ;)
I’m jealous… Have fun
I am going to sleep within 10 minutes.
I have to confess that it's been a struggle uploading photos on threads. Sometimes I try close to 5 times just to upload a single photo. Like this one uploaded on the 3rd attempt. I don't know why it's so.
By the way, it's been a while since I earned this much $LEO
Nice.
#thread2earn #feedback
It seems to work fine for me on a desktop/laptop. It's never worked for me on a phone.
It’s fun having a sister that’s married. Now I have somewhere to go eat when I’m hungry and bored 🌝
Lucky you. 😂
!DOOK
!LOLZ
!BBH
lolztoken.com
Close the door, I am dressing.
Credit: reddit
@amma1, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of luchyl
(2/4)
Delegate Hive Tokens to Farm $LOLZ and earn 110% Rewards. Learn more.
Haha Indeed
https://inleo.io/threads/view/onealfa/re-leothreads-ht9d6zjc
An open msg to @leostrategy
How your highlighted statements mach with the fact, that I (@onealfa) have not received even 1 penny of my weekly SURGE YIELD on 09.29 ?
Ppl say to me this could happen because all my 36000 SURGE where on the HE sell order on the day of snapshot (I had to put them on sale at a very high price, just to have them not be visible on the rich-list)
Is this true? If this is true - when and WHERE it was published , that SURGE coins which are on salesorder on the day of SNAPSHOT - are NOT eligible for receiving YIELD for that whole week ???
Feels like someone steel my $100.
Please put more light on this.
Where are the complete rules for receiving #surge YIELDS.
( It looks to me rather shady at the moment)
This has been one of my primary criticisms of LeoStrategy. The communications need to be more precise and fundamental information should be in a single location.
In your case hype and marketing speak has objectively conflicted with observable reality.
Someone said something about this few days, and asked exactly same question. @Leostrategy need to explain how the dividend payout works. I made a thread about this issue because the same thing will affect many people after SURGE presale.
I also have the same question to @leostrategy as I also faced the similar issue. I have done it for experiment purpose only that cost me some cents but your amount was huge. I hope leostrategy will give a satisfactory answer of it.
https://inleo.io/threads/view/khaleelkazi/re-onealfa-v5jnoqva?referral=khaleelkazi
It has to be a weekly yield if we are holding Surge, as long as they are not sold. A genuine concern.
Stop with the FUD.
https://inleo.io/threads/view/khaleelkazi/re-onealfa-v5jnoqva?referral=khaleelkazi
After all, the whole IDEA of this post was clearly marked in a BOLD text, and adresses to the token CREATOR:
IS THIS TRUE?
Yes or not ?
Simple answer, just 3 letters, from token founder will satisfy me.
It is the same as with wLEO ("It has been mentioned everywhere" - ironic answers by LEO captain).
When you asked where can you find this "everywhere" nobody answers...
I saw multiple replies to you that you had your surge in a sell order
If you’re selling should you get dividends?
The system worked as intended
I also set a sell order at a high price, as Onealfa did. I didn't want to sell my SURGE, as I said that it was for experimental purposes.
I think I just want to know the answer. If LeoStrategy says that I don't deserve it, I just want to know about it officially, as it didn't mention it in any post (I am sorry if I missed a post where it was mentioned). That's all.
Clearly since no dividends were received, they don’t get paid to surge sellers
Hmm. I saw your thread of few minutes ago. I think it would be good to mention it in a post related to SURGE. So that there will be no confusion.
You won't get any answer to that. You get no info from Khal. It works on the basis of hearsay. He thinks, that everybody thinks and knows everything exactly the same as him... That we are in his brain...
But I got the answer already.
In the introducing SURGE post, @leostrategy stated - that holders with SURGE in LPs would receive the weekly yield payment, by extension @onealfa should have a reasonable expectation to be paid yield for SURGE he owned but that was listed on market.
Incorrect as a listed sale on the order book is different than LP
It is different but your assertion was "If you’re selling should you get dividends?" SURGE in an LP is offered for sale. So the premise in your question isn't supported by Leostrategy's public communications.
OneAlfa listed his SURGE at 19.99 Hive per Surge...
I have just NO idea, should I get them, or should I not. Maybe yes, maybe not.
It should be a clear, firmly expresses RULES, where it is stated what happens in such situations. RULES, published openly, in an easy accesable format ( not perhaps a few live words, a phrase, said in one of the AMA's.)
Afterall, I will honor a clear and firm answer from the token creator(s), not the comments, guesses and assumptions from other INLEO users.
That was the whole idea om my initial threadpost.
If such rules been published ( when and where?) - I will say sorry, and will live quitley with this $103.85 loss ( just as with one of many other "fools fees")
BTW, Selling is not the same as SOLD. Sales order means - I am still owning them. Tokens are Not sold yet.
Besides all the above said - I wonder why @surge.yield bot still replies to me, that my last weekly yield was $103.850 ? Another factor, increasing missunderstandings.
It is crystal clear
If you sell your or are trying to, why are you expecting yield?
Why?
Because I am still an OWNER of them.
As simple as that.
If rules are different - I will play by the rules.
I just want to see those rules.
you are not the owner of the tokens if they are in a sell order
If you are LP’ing, you hold shares in the LP
If you hold the tokens outright, you hold the tokens
If you have tokens in a sell order, you hold nothing
I tend to disagree with this line.
How I am not the owner, if I can do what ever I want until the order is filled in?
A can cancel it any time.
I can (once it canceled) sell, donate, burn, loan those tokens at my sole, exclusive own wish, no permissions asked. No other requirements needed.
The only moment when I really stop being the owner - is the moment when the oder gets filled in. And tokens are SOLD.
You will have a hard time convince me the oposit.
P.S.
OK, lets assume some of my coins are in an open sell order on the order book, on HE.
Now, Name me please ( exactly) - WHO OWNS THEM at that particular moment. (until the order is either filled in, or canceled)
Please. Thank you.
How it feels when paying the taxes
#pepe #meme #crypto #hive #leo #surge #lstr #inleo #lolz #bitcoin #btc #business #grindsquad
Life is too short to wait for confirmations!
#dash #crypto
the future is dash?
You know it!
Hahaha 😂
BTC 🤓
Yeah, couldn't be us. Instant finality is a must.
The level of entitlement is off the charts
If you don’t hold tokens, you don’t get dividends. How is that hard to understand?
If LSTR required you to stake your SURGE, you would not get paid yield if you held it in a sell order, would you?
Their blog posts are very clear on this. People asking for it to be different are feeling a high degree of entitlement. That’d be like asking for USDC if you held LEO liquid on LeoDex vs sLEO
Duh
I think there are many who are not "entitled". They just don't understand.
Myself included. And I would bet a lot of money that I understand more than most. It is obvious that people did not understand this very well.
The entitlement is not the asking of questions
It’s the pushback when you don’t get the answer you want to hear even when you’ve been provided with logic
If you don’t own something in your wallet, you don’t get dividends
I don't have a huge problem with it per se. My pushback was due to the fact that this isn't the way it works with stocks and that is what I expected--not entitlement.
If I hold a stock that pays a dividend and put it up for limit order sale, then I receive dividends on that stock until it sells. I assumed the same here.
The new post explains it well, but I have gone back and read the original post several times and see no clear (to me anyways) indication that this is how it was.
They do say holders, but my initial understanding is that I am a holder until sold. If I put in a limit order then it is not sold until--well it is sold. I understand it is not in my wallet, but I still control that token as I can rescind the sell order at any time.
I was not selling anytime soon, so it didn't really matter to me. I can see why people could be confused and believe "logically" that it's yours until it is sold.
Glad it's all cleared up though. Really, it just needed clarity. 😀
A sell order means I hold nothing in my wallet. Correct.
Are they actually in any wallet? I don't know the answer to that one. Maybe I should.
But I still OWN them. My active key controls their fate supposedly and have set conditions under which that can happen.
Who else owns them?
The future buyer certainly does not.
The exchange could take them--I guess, but do they own them? And if they did take them could I sue them and win? And if the exchange does own them, shouldn't they get the dividends?
I don't know why this issue has irritated me so much. I have not and do not plan on selling mine. It just doesn't set right with me and I don't feel that this was clear up front and everyone is acting like it was so clear.
Oh well. Carry on! It is very clear now!
”what if my SURGE is inside of a 3 second block that’s being transferred the exact millisecond of a snapshot and doesn’t get counted?”
The what if game could be played to oblivion IMHO. In the latest @leostrategy post, they reiterated what was said in the launch post(s):
Your surge can be held in two places to get dividends
Nowhere in those two scenarios does it cover the “what if” scenarios of sell orders, transferring, etc.
If you have it in a sell order, it isn’t liquid in your wallet.
IMHO the issue here is that LeoStrategy did in fact tell all of us the two places we could HODL SURGE to get paid. People just don’t like the answer
That’s a whole other debate to have than “we didn’t know because they didn’t say”
I don’t think it’s their job to outline what you can’t do when they’ve already outlined what you can do.
Again, this is all my opinion
Well with that scenario, I would say tough titty (I don't seem to know how to spell that word)! Some things you just have to let go! 🤣
In my opinion it wasn't that clear on the front end (obviously not to some others as well), but that has been corrected for sure with the new article.
Now I must go back into lurking mode and rty to find some more dry powder before the $SURGE sells out!!
Yeah Rafiki solves this!
Soon we can just ask him and he knows all our posts and can reply instantly with the correct answer
I think perhaps it's just not intuitive to people that just because you are selling something means you are no longer holding it. In real life, you hold it until you get paid.
wtf happened xD So people think, cause they hodled onc,e they receive dividends for a lifetime?
steep thesis
!BBH
holding LP and Surge seems to be the way I'll make it
Plan is to add both.
agreed. that sense of entitlement in the Hive ecosystem drives me nuts.
how about providing some value
Crypto people - Give me free stuff.
Good morning! 🌞 Wishing you a bright, positive, and productive day ahead. May everything you do today bring you closer to your goals—have a great day! 🌟
Good morning
Thanks, buddy, same to you.
Good morning. I wish you a good and positive day for you.
By the way, it's evening here.
An excellent day to you too and I hope everything goes well for you. 😎
Get your SURGE while you still can Lions 🦁🦁🚀
#leostrategy #surge #lstr
We like the open discussion we've been seeing about SURGE Yield
Our blog post today offers a refresher course in how SURGE Yield is calculated and paid out which dives deeper into the mechanics than our original posts did
TLDR;
https://inleo.io/@leostrategy/surge-yield-refresher-exactly-how-surge-yield-is-calculated-and-paid-gtq?referral=leostrategy
Thanks for sharing things with simple examples and details. Not that it's understandable to everyone.
East or West. North or South.
Wish I knew. Hmmm, My guess is East based on its color. Green means fruitfulness and riches. 🙈
That's a nice way to "follow the money" out there.
It’s not East vs West or North vs South , it’s institutions + networks.
Wealth clusters where rule of law, education, and capital are strongest.
Always good to see ;)
As long as it is not 0.00, it's ok.
SURGE Is a perpetual preferred tokenized share of LSTR. Let's break each word of this sentence down:
In short, SURGE is a convertible note on the LSTR token. 1 SURGE = 0.02 LSTR and this means that as LSTR's price rises, SURGE's price rises as well.
What happens now that LSTR is not yet $50, if the SURGE presale finishes today, will the SURGE:LSTR pool still trade for 1SURGE to 0.02 LSTR?
ARBISCAN balancecheck-tool shows I still have 0.436 arbi-LEO left in my wallet.
However, on LEODEX, where ever I go, it shows me I have 0.000 LEO.
Who knows, is this an intentional feature? Or just a simple BUG?
#feedback
Dust
The question remains open:
Bug or FEATURE ?
OK, then what is not a dust?
Is 0.91 LEO a dust?
Is 1.2 LEO a dust ?
Is 1.666 LEO a dust?
Or 4.44 LEO?
Where is the line between dust and nondust?
SIRP on threads is a better return then LeoDex USDC right now.
Not saying that will always be the way but it is the current state of things.
I am staking any Leo I earn on threads to rebuild my Leo here also I am converting all my USDC to Leo and staking as sLeo.
I am keeping all my LP here.
wow. really?
Yepp.
It'll be interesting to see how it'll play out when $LEO will be worth USD 2 or 3, instead of 12 cents, lol.
Will need more Lions to step up and grow LeoDex Volume
yes we do.
I am working on the back-ends.
I can't actually post about crypto on X right now as it affects our game launches as the game industry is super anti-crypto right now after all the rug pulls etc....
I may start a new account that does only crypto.
The good thing is that we have the option to earn both sides where on LeoDex we earn a difference currency we can use to purchase other tokens and on InLeo, we continue to earn more LEO from our curation.
The future will be greater as the trading volume on LeoDex increases.
If you have SURGE in a sell order, you don’t get dividends for those SURGE
This makes perfect sense to me. LeoStrategy pays yield without requiring staking
If they did require staking, then you obviously wouldn’t earn anything if you have a sell order
You can LP your SURGE and still get yield according to their blog post. This is logical as providing LP is a net benefit to the economy but selling your SURGE is a net negative
I said it before that it doesn't look logical to expect dividend payout when SURGE is in a sell order.
100%
If I have a sell order on a stock, AFAIK I get dividends until it sells. Seems more logical to require stake for dividends than this hybrid approach. Im not selling so I dont have a personal stake (See what I did there?) just an observation
Oh well, it's just an opinion, and I have nothing against anyone who wants to sell
People are different. What seems logical to one person, may look ilogic for other. That is why games are played by a RULES, not by logic assumptions.
The whole point of my post was - asking a clear & firm confirmation from a token founder, if assumptions from other Inleo participants, given to me , were RIGHT, or not
YES or NOT.
Unfortunatelly, token founder still keeps silent.
It wasn't for you post that I said that though, it was for someone else yesterday who complained about not getting dividend payout for his SURGE that were in a sell order.
And khal made a thread about it that SURGE in a sell order cannot get dividend payout. That was where I made this reply you are responding to. Moreover, I believe that khal know more about the inside and out of Leostrategy to make the thread. No offense please!
perfect. Thanks khal. Makes sense to me too.
🦁
I got the answer now. Thanks for for the information.
logical
Firstly, I hold a lot of $SURGE and have no plans to sell, but this makes no sense to me.
A person who puts there shares up for LP is also potentially "selling" and does not hold it in their wallet.
Either both should get dividends or neither.
I disagree and here’s why:
If you put 1000 tokens in a seller order at $100 per SURGE on an order book, are your tokens being used for anything productive?
If you put 1000 tokens in an LP, you have to match it with 1000 USDC. You are actually investing MORE to hold that LP position (using exogenous capital). Then your paired 1000+1000 are being used to provide instantaneous market liquidity which is a net benefit to the system
How are these two possibly the same?
Both are providing liquidity are they not?
How so?
When I buy SURGE from an LP, I am buying some % of SURGE from the user who LP’d $1000 SURGE + $1000 USDC
When I buy SURGE on the order book and the seller has a sell order, I get 0% fill from him? If I do get fill, he no longer owns the SURGE anyways
They were providing liquidity nonetheless. Just not the direction we want! 😀
If I buy 1000 $SURGE and just let them sit in my wallet are they doing anything productive outside of providing the initial capital? NO
In my opinion, if I buy 1000 $surge and put a sell limit order for $100, then I have provided exactly the same benefit as someone who just lets them sit in the wallet. CAPITAL And I have provided liquidity to the market, just to the downside.
Don't we want a two-way market?
We just fixed our Tokenomics few months ago. We cannot get ourselves back into bad incentives. Those who already have sell orders are weak hands. Rewards should flow to the strongest hands.
airdrop farming is back in fashion again.
I have not done it since I had a large ATOM stake.
I'm delta-neutral farming perp dexes at the moment. I think that's the name of the game these days. Small losses on fees, will see if it's worth it in the end...
just watch those funding fees .. it can be insane
Yeah, I've noticed! 😬 Gonna make some real trades here and there to try to cover those costs... And actually, it's not the funding fees (cos I don't keep those trades open for that long), but the opening fees moreover.
for the new airdrops are marketing to scam new invesors :D
The LSTR market looks so promising.
Perp Dex Volumes:
All about airdrop farming.
I'd say Jupiter & Hyperliquid are the only ones somewhat organic.
#crypto
Aster is the least organic lol, I hope they find a way to keep even half the volume once the farming ends.
100%. People farming that like crazy. Definitely interesting to whether people will stay after their airdrop is done. Hyperliquid has already established themselves as something people will keep on using.
New LeoDex Weekly Recap is LIVE!
I'm linking this X Thread below. Please go like and repost!
Done
it’s my parents 54th wedding anniversary!
Congratulations to them
Congratulations to them. Wish them on the behalf of mine.
happy anniversary to them!
Congratulations to them, and may they continue to be happy together.
will surge drop below 150K today????
I think so!
buy what you can it will be gone soon.
Sure.
!BBH
100%
I am confident about it.
Silver almost to $48
Did this quiz on X (link in comments), pretty fun with all the strange questions. 😅👍 Find out your true identity!
The description is cool lol. Paycheck as dry powder 😂😎
😂 I laughed at that part as well!
working on a killer feature that will my my reseller app incredibly powerful
scouting is gunna get way easier
it's uptober
Fun Fact: UP are my IRL initials and i‘m born in October 💪🏽😎👍🏽
oh hell yeah
Good start! 👍
hopefully it continues
Higher!
Really?
yep, as of today lol
Cool Fallout poster, been waiting for this second season.... seems like lots of new characters coming up, who is that green guy fighting the knight?
#skiptvads, #tvonleo, #fallout, #lucy
The Uptober effect ⤵️
https://inleo.io/@ssjsasha/uptober-effect-9kv?referral=ssjsasha
I asked ChatGPT to summarize @leostrategy's latest blog for me:
Your SURGE balance can only be seen by @surge.yield if it is:
Got it.
thanks for clarification
The easiest and cheapest way to get your assets on HyperEVM is PRJX. Bridge from any chain, no fees. Wish I knew about this sooner.
Link in comments 👇
#crypto
https://www.prjx.com/@brando28
A look at the August 1987 issue of Compute!
#retrocomputing #computers #bbh #cent
Highlights include reviews of Might and Magic and Realms of Darkness, a type in game called Climber 5, and much more.
Check out the original post for more from this issue: https://ecency.com/retrocomputing/@darth-azrael/compute-august-1987
🐂 Bullish mode: ON ⚡️ #Dash
@dashpay $DASH #crypto #dashto5000 #adoption #evolution
To those who are new to SURGE, here's the list of commands you can play with, including setting your rewards (yields) to HBD or LSTR:
https://inleo.io/threads/view/surge.yield/re-senorcoconut-t1759330856802-txw
Erica Alexander en American Fiction representa todo lo que necesitamos en una pareja, alguien que te confronte cuando estas siendo idiota pero que también te apoye, su línea sobre que no poder relacionarse con la gente no es medalla de honor es perfecta
#ericaalexander, #americanfiction, #relaciones, #confrontacion, #sabiduria
Ceballos tuvo un partido decente y Guler tambien mostro cosas interesantes en ataque aunque para mi gusto Ceballos no estuvo tan participativo como deberia, igual se nota que estos jugadores pueden aportar en el sistema que quiere implementar Xabi pero necesitan ser más consistentes en los partidos importantes
#ceballos,#guler,#realmadrid,#mediocampo,#xabialonso
📌Today in the @dashpay's world🧵
➡️Recap of the day on our Telegram group📩
🚨Token2049 and Bull mode on🤩🚀
🤝Join us for a free discussion👇🗣
#DailyNews #Bitcoin #Crypto #Blockchain #News $DASH #Web3
👉 https://t.me/dash_chat_italia/83799
Brahim marco el quinto gol en los ultimos segundos del partido para cerrar la goleada con un 5 a 0 que pudo ser más abultado, el español entro desde el banquillo y aprovecho su oportunidad demostrando que tiene nivel para aportar cuando Xabi Alonso lo necesita durante la temporada
#brahim,#realmadrid,#gol,#campeones,#banquillo
Jurassic World Rebirth llega a Peacock el 30 de octubre justo para Halloween después de haber dominado la taquilla, la película superó a Superman y a The Fantastic Four, Scarlett Johansson es la protagonista como Zora Bennett en una misión para recolectar material genético de tres criaturas gigantes, ya hay rumores de que Universal está trabajando en una secuela con Johansson regresando
#jurassicworldrebirth, #peacock, #scarlettjohansson, #taquilla, #secuela
This is absolutely true. The same is true for things such as intelligence, competence, and athleticism.
Today, I'm getting a cashier's check to get repairs started on my car at the collision repair shop. It's gonna be iffy. There's a chance the insurance company might consider it a loss. But we won't know until they start working on it.
5 BRIEF GRATITUDE PRAYERS:
picked up my daily SURGE
Nice
!BBH
I am going to buy mine now.