Funny yet true that there is always someone or a body that is holding on to the most vital transaction to open up a system. Often I hear people say I will pay you off when I get paid. I'm not basically talking about government workers or salary earners, even self employed and businesses owe debt. I am just wondering who could actually always be the one hanging a whole transaction process. Debt has become a way of life when undergoing a lot of day to day activities which always drops the question of 'is money not enough in the system'? Or is it how the system is designed to operate.
Central banks are printing money almost everyday, so why is there always a continuous shortage of cash in the system? Is it for the fact that too much cash flow may obese the system or is it for the sake of hoarding power? You know that feeling that equivalent and efficient transaction may shift power from the authorities who surround the system. Could debt owing be a permutation process to keep the crowded industries in an ever wanting process, you know that old saying, he who controls the money, controls the people.
Always tiring and boring to know that almost everyone who owes is as a result of him being owed and the process continues on and on. We know what debt can do to businesses and individuals alike. It creates poor planning and slow business processes when resources can not be brought in on time. It goes further to tamper with emotions when you see one call or the other from your creditor and you feel this could have been over long ago if what actually is due you was released on time. So I ask again, who could this first debtor actually be?
Could it be the government?
Economists know the need for control in every given system. That tactic of spotting out that thing in which if you could take a full hold of it would keep the entire population at your mercy. Could the government be playing this game? You know, always owing those under their payroll to stimulate the needed influence. We have been hearing this, the government is yet to pay, forcing individuals to get a later pay service. You know what this means, debt has been brought forward to the next month.
Just realized one thing with money. You need it to solve an instant problem and when you solve the problem without that instant payment, that is another problem entirely. Sometimes I feel money is a trap to keep the citizens unauthoritative. Even the best of financial planners find it difficult to cope in such state, come to talk of a lot of people who have little to no financial intelligence at all. The way banks play this game through government aid is one of the reasons centralized systems continue to be a debatable means when it comes to fair financing.
Why must there always be work to do yet no money to pay? If money were to be backed by gold as of old I would have said, maybe gold has become scarce. The entire system is backed by no commodity, just government authorization, are you telling me the Central banks are running out of ink and papers?
Could it be the Conglomerates?
You know when we mention power, the first thing that comes into our mind is the government, yet there are other systems behind the system which may even be more disruptive. Who is the government if not a set of bodies who have been given the right to rule. There are those who don't need such an office to exercise influence. Yes the big businesses, conglomerates, whale investors and so many names you could attribute to them.
Could they always be playing the game of demand and supply? Caging cash flow to disrupt markets into debt pressure which could stimulate doors for loans with interest in the process. I know you may be thinking, how can they achieve this? What if they refused the needed transactions to reach the banking system and hoarded the money on external wallets like the safe? How does the banks in the process, especially the commercial ones have the needed cash flow to settle little business.
I guess sometimes what we don't know seems impossible but to others it's always a mega opportunity. This hoarding process can trigger the needed fear to put the market into a new debt hole. That's why a lot of people overwork themselves and fear to leave an organization because of the debt pile on their head.
Don't know if there is any individual out there that loves to owe because I personally don't. I hate the whole process of a pending transaction forcing you into debt. Just came to realize that debt itself leads to inconvenience debt, in your extension to get debts you have to pay extra charges for it. Is this not a loss to an individual? I guess the game of this first debtor has come to stay, it may not look fair but there are people who are hungry for dominance and will break fairness to get this done.
Posted Using InLeo Alpha