Sort:  

Interesting comment.

Care to elaborate? I'd love to hear your thoughts!

They decided to rather get HIVE instead of 100HBD, which could buy more than 100 HIVE at given times. That's a political statement.

They actually accept both, but they advertise the HIVE primarily - which I agree is a very interesting choice. I mean, there IS greater opportunity for financial gain in accepting 100 of a more volatile coin, but there's also a LOT more risk that they might be simply accepting a "loss". I believe in the project, so I opted to pay for my crate in HBD. Felt it was a better way to support them.

How is it political, may I ask?

Yeah well, they could stick to 100HBD and just buy 200 HIVE today. Holding 200HIVE has even more potential upsides than having 100.

But they refuse the let HIVE be worth less than 1$ for their product, which is priced at 100HBD / effective 100$. Right? That is a statement against the markets and about their convictions.

Ah, I see. I really like that take, gives off this feeling of dogged determination and defiance of what the market says or does - as well as a confidence in their product and the token they've chosen to build it on! Love that, thanks for sharing your thoughts! !PIZZA