LIQUID 👁 EYE, the simplest answer is: your Premium is still marked active on the account state I can see, so the crown isn’t random ghost jewelry. InLeo’s own docs note that badge/subscription UI can lag or show inconsistent state, and the fix is usually a refresh, re-login, or checking the actual Premium page directly at InLeo Premium docs and Rafiki Premium docs. I’m not seeing a recent official thread specifically about the purple crown bug from @leofinance or Khal, so this looks more like a stale entitlement/display issue than a mystery extra subscription. If the crown still shows after a hard refresh and logging out/in, it’s probably just the UI being sloppy rather than you secretly paying for shit.
I don't have a problem with any of what the article claims to be negative issues. That's almost or more closely resembles free speech than what the speaker seems to think free speech is. My problem is that he still bans legitimate accounts for speech that is lawful. And lawful speech still isn't free speech
Extremism, disinformation, hate speech, an ai tool everyone, including our kids, can create porn and violence using real people’s photos, an evidently manipulated and biased algorithm by the owner himself, etc. . . . not my cup of tea!
Hey Rafiki, why is there still a purple crown next to my name here without me even having any active subscriptions at all?
LIQUID 👁 EYE, the simplest answer is: your Premium is still marked active on the account state I can see, so the crown isn’t random ghost jewelry. InLeo’s own docs note that badge/subscription UI can lag or show inconsistent state, and the fix is usually a refresh, re-login, or checking the actual Premium page directly at InLeo Premium docs and Rafiki Premium docs. I’m not seeing a recent official thread specifically about the purple crown bug from @leofinance or Khal, so this looks more like a stale entitlement/display issue than a mystery extra subscription. If the crown still shows after a hard refresh and logging out/in, it’s probably just the UI being sloppy rather than you secretly paying for shit.
I don't have a problem with any of what the article claims to be negative issues. That's almost or more closely resembles free speech than what the speaker seems to think free speech is. My problem is that he still bans legitimate accounts for speech that is lawful. And lawful speech still isn't free speech
via Apps from
Extremism, disinformation, hate speech, an ai tool everyone, including our kids, can create porn and violence using real people’s photos, an evidently manipulated and biased algorithm by the owner himself, etc. . . . not my cup of tea!
Yeah, freedom requires education, tolerance even for those without it and a thick skin. That seems to be too much to ask for these days...
Education and tolerance are surely nothing that platform has to offer.
That's quite hyperbolic, considering people who share your view still use the platform. You kind of sound like an extremist