Well, you could state in what particular I am wrong, and maybe we could figure it out. Do you think that BTC that has been around for ~12 years is comparable to life that has been around for ~4B years? That's pretty silly. Do you think that the physical integrity of planet Earth is comparable to the whims of banksters in terms of risk? Make a case. You're just making an ad hominem which is basically an admission you have no arguments.
You have long stated that Bitcoin Core is in control of the Bitcoin Protocol. You're being proven wrong on this front as well, which is pretty much the same exact concept.
Bitcoin Core was delegated power.
And now that they are saying they are going to remove the op_return 80 byte limit people are switching over to Bitcoin Knots in protest. Bitcoin Core was never in control of Bitcoin.
Mining pools are delegated power: they can't attack/control Bitcoin.
Most of Blackrock's power is also pure delegation.
You seem to greatly struggle with this idea that when people fuck around they find out very quickly. The balance of power at the top is not a pyramid; it's an inverted pyramid that can topple over for like any reason. You just think it's an easy job because they are experts at balancing the teetering pyramid and make it look easy and stable.
Blackrock is in control of very little. What they are in control of is delegated to them by their benefactors. They do not make big waves. They are masters of the Butterfly Effect. Small nudges that lead to big profitable outcomes. Larry Fink is the face of a single hedge fund (in a sea of hedge funds). His power is even more limited than Blackrock's.
Larry Fink personally pushed DEI and ESG. There's a lot of that going around. He's also the Agenda Director for the WEF, in addition to being the CEO of BlackRock. You sell him short.
This is literally example in my favor concerning exactly what I am talking about.
DEI and ESG were left-wing political ideologies that half of the population wanted anyway.
He nudged it in that direction and the outcome was massive because it had support.
And now he does not do it because it was not profitable or effective.
So the best example you can give is not only one that had support but also one that failed and is no longer employed. I am shaking in muh boots right now.
I strongly disagree. Because Fink used his power to force companies to adopt these measures, and promoted them via powerful propaganda, I doubt very much you can provide any empirical evidence of that claim.
Your use of mockery only reveals your character. My mother raised me to respect myself and only say things worthy of me.
He likes to go big or go home
Well, you could state in what particular I am wrong, and maybe we could figure it out. Do you think that BTC that has been around for ~12 years is comparable to life that has been around for ~4B years? That's pretty silly. Do you think that the physical integrity of planet Earth is comparable to the whims of banksters in terms of risk? Make a case. You're just making an ad hominem which is basically an admission you have no arguments.
I accept your concession.
It isn't. BTC can be transacted using just about any communication network. So your argument falls flat from the beginning. Go educate yourself.
Pray tell, what cables, radio transmitters, or satellites aren't owned by BlackRock?
The ones that are not owned by BlackRock, any other questions?
Nothing isn't owned by BlackRock.
Yeah, talking to you is futile.
Existence of pirate radio stations, proves that there are things and communication equipment that is not owned by BlackRock.
Maybe use that thing what is called a brain that is sitting on your head the next time.
You are claiming that BTC will have any substantial value if it can only be transmitted by pirate radio?
You have long stated that Bitcoin Core is in control of the Bitcoin Protocol. You're being proven wrong on this front as well, which is pretty much the same exact concept.
Bitcoin Core was delegated power.
And now that they are saying they are going to remove the op_return 80 byte limit people are switching over to Bitcoin Knots in protest. Bitcoin Core was never in control of Bitcoin.
Mining pools are delegated power: they can't attack/control Bitcoin.
Most of Blackrock's power is also pure delegation.
You seem to greatly struggle with this idea that when people fuck around they find out very quickly. The balance of power at the top is not a pyramid; it's an inverted pyramid that can topple over for like any reason. You just think it's an easy job because they are experts at balancing the teetering pyramid and make it look easy and stable.
Blackrock is in control of very little. What they are in control of is delegated to them by their benefactors. They do not make big waves. They are masters of the Butterfly Effect. Small nudges that lead to big profitable outcomes. Larry Fink is the face of a single hedge fund (in a sea of hedge funds). His power is even more limited than Blackrock's.
Larry Fink personally pushed DEI and ESG. There's a lot of that going around. He's also the Agenda Director for the WEF, in addition to being the CEO of BlackRock. You sell him short.
This is literally example in my favor concerning exactly what I am talking about.
DEI and ESG were left-wing political ideologies that half of the population wanted anyway.
He nudged it in that direction and the outcome was massive because it had support.
And now he does not do it because it was not profitable or effective.
So the best example you can give is not only one that had support but also one that failed and is no longer employed. I am shaking in muh boots right now.
I strongly disagree. Because Fink used his power to force companies to adopt these measures, and promoted them via powerful propaganda, I doubt very much you can provide any empirical evidence of that claim.
Your use of mockery only reveals your character. My mother raised me to respect myself and only say things worthy of me.