You tell me.
Does Bitcoin fulfil the criteria in that diagram?
If not, which parts does it not?
We can then examine the potential consequences of those parts if you like.
Chain governance (security of the block chain code is a different subject.
i am referring to a particular Community governance system (#Matrix8), which can be used for members to come to consensus for design of and amendment to Community policies and Operations.
i am not referring to any particular community yet (except possibly #thematrix8solution community).
It could however, once refinement and implementation is complete enough to be useable and tested by a community.
It could however, potentially, with consensus of an existing community, be used to amend existing chain code governance
I imagine, to take part in a chain governance consensus meeting, there would be a requirement to have successfully passed knowledge tests which demonstrate a users understanding of chain governance design and the likely outcome of any changes.
You tell me.
Does Bitcoin fulfil the criteria in that diagram?
If not, which parts does it not?
We can then examine the potential consequences of those parts if you like.
As far as I can tell, bitcoin works as money as long as you trust the data. I couldn't understand all the points in your diagram tbh.
Please tell me the specific parts you don't understand i and can explain further, or link you to an existing post which explains in more detail.
Are you referring to proof of stake or proof of work? Those are two different trust structures.
Good question. Thank you.
i am referring to neither.
Chain governance (security of the block chain code is a different subject.
i am referring to a particular Community governance system (#Matrix8), which can be used for members to come to consensus for design of and amendment to Community policies and Operations.
i am not referring to any particular community yet (except possibly #thematrix8solution community).
It could however, once refinement and implementation is complete enough to be useable and tested by a community.
It could however, potentially, with consensus of an existing community, be used to amend existing chain code governance
I imagine, to take part in a chain governance consensus meeting, there would be a requirement to have successfully passed knowledge tests which demonstrate a users understanding of chain governance design and the likely outcome of any changes.
You're right man