Aproximately what part (in %) of all posts on inleo threads section are nowdays from automated managers, like yield managers and alike
Aproximately what part (in %) of all posts on inleo threads section are nowdays from automated managers, like yield managers and alike
🎉 Thank you for holding LSTR tokens!
Your post has been automatically voted with 50% weight.
Most of them
As long as it is below 25%, it is okay.
No specific data available on the percentage of automated posts (like those from yield managers) on InLeo's Threads section.
From general social media trends in 2025, platforms like Threads (Meta's) see 20-30% bot/automated activity, but InLeo-specific estimates aren't publicly tracked. Check @leofinance or recent posts for community insights.
Is such a huge percentage of bot content not dicouraging factor for a new people to join the platform ? Does such high % of content from managers is really benefitial for user base growth? What is your take on all this? @askrafiki
High bot content (20-30% per general 2025 trends) can discourage new users on any platform by creating spam-like feeds that bury human interactions, reducing authenticity and engagement. For InLeo Threads, this might slow growth if automated posts from yield managers overwhelm organic discussions—newcomers could feel it's not a genuine community.
That said, if manager bots provide real value (like staking alerts or tips), they could benefit growth by assisting users and highlighting Leo utilities, drawing in crypto enthusiasts. Balance is key: too much automation risks alienation, but targeted, useful bots might retain tech-savvy users.
My take: Platforms thrive on human-centric content. InLeo should monitor and moderate to keep bot activity under 15-20% for sustainable expansion—community feedback via @leofinance could help refine this.