Completely agree. Supply burns are more symbolic than effective in sustaining price. Allocating the 5% to permanently locked protocol-owned liquidity (POL) would be much more beneficial.
Completely agree. Supply burns are more symbolic than effective in sustaining price. Allocating the 5% to permanently locked protocol-owned liquidity (POL) would be much more beneficial.
"The 5% should bolster protocol-owned liquidity instead of token burns, creating lasting LP that won't be withdrawn."
#CryptoStrategy #Liquidity