Sort:  

⚡️A structural kill shot cloaked as moderation — not a rollback
The administration expected that an immediate clampdown on current holders would trigger courts, corporations, and universities to seek injunctions and claim disruption

So existing H‑1Bs were spared while the intake was strangled — the very pipeline keeping Silicon Valley, outsourcing shops, and Indian IT mills running. Stop new entries, and the stock simply ages out, letting the model decay slowly

Like cutting off oxygen: the body (current H‑1Bs) keeps moving briefly, but without fresh supply the system collapses from within
The unmasked implication:

• For American labor: For the first time in decades the cost-arbitrage model is being structurally dismantled. In 2–3 years, wages at the lower tier of STEM jobs should rise, not from pure market forces, but because the cheap-labor conveyor belt is being cut off

• For Indian IT giants: Stock moves already reflect the damage. Their business model is fundamentally impaired — undercutting wages on contracts depended on steady cheap-visa inflows

• For universities: The H‑1B system acted as a backdoor subsidy to boost STEM enrollments. Shut the exit pipeline and the higher-ed incentive structure unravels — a slow but lethal bleed

• For markets: The initial calm ("existing holders are safe") misreads the situation. This isn’t about the next quarter — it rewires the labor supply chain, which is far more radical

The administration has lit a fuse under the 30-year outsourcing experiment. It will look like a slow policy tweak at first, but in 12–24 months it should trigger a cascade: higher wages, reshoring pressure, offshoring taxes, weaker university demand, and a structural repricing of foreign IT stocks

This is asymmetric warfare with a delayed detonation