Interesting question. I still don't think it should be rewarded, but that could be black and white of me. Yet that's not a bad thing either. Doesn't that mean people are going to chuck out a lot of AI posts on the blind hope people will engage and reward? If this kind of value is end game, why isn't a little sentence at the end saying 'This was co written with ChatGPT' or 'This was written by CHAT GPT in response to the prompt x' a good idea? If people really believed in the AI they'd do this but for most part they are doing it just for the rewards.
Interestingly I find when they do that they aren't sourcing their images either, AI gen or not.
I don't think that's the case because people generally don't like spammers and those just looking to extract value won't bother doing that manual part where you need to actually talk to other human beings (I think), haha.
But sure, having a disclaimer might be the best way to go in terms of transparency but in my opinion, if I enjoyed the content and/or learned something from it, and/or engaged with it. I don't see why that disclaimer would even matter, right?
Nah, I wanna know. There's enough lies and deception on the internet as it is.
That's cool, but those that will use it maliciously won't tell you anyway.
Nope, but I'll try my best to figure it out and rain on their parade if I suspect! 😂😂😂