Quality on $HIVE is so subjective. I have a full blown blogpost on leofinance that has less than a dollar worth of upvotes and then there was a reply to a thread that received almost $2 worth of upvotes #earning #hive #microblogging
Quality on $HIVE is so subjective. I have a full blown blogpost on leofinance that has less than a dollar worth of upvotes and then there was a reply to a thread that received almost $2 worth of upvotes #earning #hive #microblogging
100000% subjective. Completely agree.
See. Why do I bother blogging if microblogging is this good ? :D
lol Attack from all angles man!!!
Here. Hold my beer :P
It happens to the best of us 😜
bro, you have 15-20 $ upvoted posts like all the time
and I only very rarely
and I was even thinking of upvoting ur post with @tipu - that's why I looked for that post..
leofinance is also pushed a little too much with upvotes compared to the real information contained..
I am lucky to receive Leo votes based on my engagement and interactions. I was referring to posts that did not get upvotes compared to threads. Thanks for checking though 😇🙏
hm ok then Im just not lucky
never got a leo vote
this is probably also why I only post very rarely into leofinance
leofinance is focussing on newbies, is pushing them and then just dropping them - cuz there are new newbies
this is big rewards for newbies at the beginning and then declining
I guess it is supposed to catch the newbies, show them here is something to get...
but why should they stay if they earn less for their real quality posts than for the first few shit posts the yposted (which were rewarded greatly)
ah ofc dont let me forget old circlejerks are also voted very big
of course not only leo votes are like this, I'm unsure if this behavior of curators will be successfull in the long run
no problem, you are welcome