You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Flexible Consumption

in LeoFinance3 years ago

Great post @tarazkp.
Though, i took my time to read this content, which makes total sense.
I still get confused with the workplace flexibility or the paycheck stuff, but from my own understand, i think flexibility isn't related to both the employer and employee.

Employees
You've already given an explaination to this, saying that they isn't flexibility for them.

Employers
Whatever the employees declares is what the employers stick with. I guess this set of people just follow rules, most especially in organizations where work loads are always pill up.
I think that "people who work from home, tends to be more flexible, thereby producing more results". But, not all organizations allow working from home.

The younger generations aren't wrong, the costs of living are higher. But, the older generations aren't wrong either, we are consuming more too and, an lot of what we consume is non-essential. It might be essential to have an internet connection, but it isn't essential to have a PlayStation, Netflix, Spotify, Prime, HBO,

And i also agree with this. People tends to live extravagant lifestyle without even knowing. They see those things you mentioned as normal things.

And i am sorry for pointing out this

PlayStation, Netflix, Spotify, Prime, HBO

But i think the companies incharge of those listed names above won't be happy for say their products aren't necessary.

My comment is too long,i guess it won't make any sense if i comment further, and i am not sure of what i even wrote, please do well to correct me and give further explaination. Thank you.

Sort:  

But i think the companies incharge of those listed names above won't be happy for say their products aren't necessary.

I don't write for them ;)
They aren't necessary - no one dies if Playstations disappear.

Lolzzz😂, that true.
But we might also consider the fact that some people are addict to it 😂