The clarity in the argument is appreciated, but it is essential that the Constitution comes first.
"Should Mahmoud Khalil face charges and secure a conviction for an actual offense, deportation would be appropriate.
The clarity in the argument is appreciated, but it is essential that the Constitution comes first.
"Should Mahmoud Khalil face charges and secure a conviction for an actual offense, deportation would be appropriate.
However, if the only issue at hand involves endorsing a designated terrorist organization, then the entire process seems unduly theatrical.
While it is understood that CUAD's harassment of Jews and property destruction fall outside protected speech, the legal approach to date effectively claims that permanent residents are barred from expressing opinions the Secretary of State
deems harmful to U.S. foreign policy. This stands as a significant infringement on free speech. Despite strong disapproval for campus support of reprehensible practices, American principles remain paramount."