You'd be spending a lot of time reviewing articles and individually checking them for plagiarism. It might suck to read any article if you tried to tackle it all by yourself.
I wonder if you could up that efficiency by accessing the Hive database. Certain data tables display what the user wrote in their article. You could copy/paste them quickly into your plagiarism checker for a faster evaluation.
- Your work brings the attention of monitoring groups
- Attention to curators
- Attention to the content creators
With your efforts and attention, you can bring the HIVE admin's can develop a tool that auto-checks your work for plagiarism. The technology is out there. I have to use one at school and submit it with my assignments a while back. Now, when I submit my work, it's automatically checked for grammar and plagiarism. I imagine it's what we'd have to do eventually to raise the value of the coin. Who wants to invest in a platform that can't control the value of its content?
Finally, maybe you can do a compilation article
- Presenting those articles you cited for plagiarism.
- Authors that have improved in their performance
- Authors that continue to violate.
Ms. @badbitch, I do believe you have started the beginnings of a value-empire that can change the face and value of HIVE.
Finally, perhaps with the monitoring groups, you can make such a project come to life where the system actively scans article posts upon selecting "PUBLISH". You've really got something here.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Thank you @scholaris.leo I did think of bringing all abusers in one post like today's piece. It really won't be much work as though I'd be focusing on one interface, I couldn't possibly dig the entire Hive chain, nah that's not a job for one person.
However, I do realize when am reading a fishy content, to be honest, I didn't even read half way when I decided to scan through then drop it on a plagiarism checker.
But the idea of creating a post specifically for it would be cool.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I don't think it's just cool. I think it's genius. I read constantly for work, school, and personal time. Regarding the HIVE blockchain, I don't recall reading a compilation post citing plagiarism. Heck, I don't know that any one interface or token actually covers it in detail in a published blog.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I appreciate it. I guess we'll have it started on Hive, when people are publicly exposed they tend to adjust quicker and others will definitely learn from it I suppose.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Yeah, there's a lot of reasons why someone would present an article that way. Not all are nefarious. It could be a simple misunderstanding of expectations. What I have seen though, is that if you uphold a standard, then people are likely to follow through with it.
HIVE, however, isn't a small class whose grammar and plagiarism checks can be automated with high accuracy. A lot of people apparently do what you suggest though I have to write your method appears the most effective and, sadly, underutilized.
I see a lot of downvotes cast on a majority of articles with no explanation. Your presentation is a solid attempt and would change things for the better.
I guess so because I did notice something while trying to compare the results. I noticed some duplicates all over, where the same article is posted in like 5 different websites but different authors.
I guess someone might feel it's right just because it's been done out there. But it's not right, most of those other websites are news forums and most times they have copyright agreements, but the open world may not necessarily care about that. But when it comes to Hive where you're making more off this things, you have got to understand that copying everything from word to word is not just acceptable, and judging from how he spammed the community with over 5 articles in the time span of three hours, it was clear he knew what he was doing and right now you can spot his downvote on my posts which proves he's of no good,if he wasn't aware then he would be pleading right now.
They will all be down because it's just not fair for the Unique and hard working users on the platform.
Your argument is just and sound. There's no counter to what you've described. Ascribing "no good" as a moniker is legitimate. Also, your description is easily verifiable so others can come to the same conclusion. Yours is a solid strategy with value.
What we need, if it exists, is a founding central strategy on HIVE unless it already exists applicable to plagiarism. Something everyone can reference. I'd love to take that up after finals are over next week. If I want to learn about Leo, for instance, I just check out their library for the basics. Everything else I learn afterward comes from individual articles people write. Is there something that exists regarding plagiarism?
You're also correct that it isn't fair to those who work hard to create content here.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Uhm, if you're talking about an Article explaining what plagiarism is and how not to fall a victim, I pretty much never Come across any!
I think it'd be nice to write one Article that could be added to leopedia so that new users can understand how not to be caught in the act.
On a publication where one is making money off, it is always very crucial that things of this nature are taken care off, If some kind of investigation should be done on Hive I believe a lot of users will be caught and sued, most may not be aware that it was wrong tho.
It's just as risky as copying another company's trademark and placing it on your own products up on sale, that company could pretty much Bill you of everything you have.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta