Sort:  

An interaction with ChatGPT 5.1 examined what that AI would say about Scott's influence, with this condensed summary:

Scott Adams has had a real but selective impact on online political communication. His persuasion concepts didn't transform all political discourse, but they did change how certain communities discuss politics, especially since 2016

The most visible signs of that influence are:

"Two movies on one screen" becoming a common metaphor for polarization
More creators treating politics as persuasion architecture rather than factual debate

Broader use of terms like framing, anchoring, identity persuasion, and pacing/leading after they were popularized for general audiences

Meme-makers and some influencers adopting linguistic framing and emotional priming techniques similar to his analyses

The influence is mostly indirect — ideas are used without attribution — and shows up more in persuasion-aware, anti-establishment, or right-leaning circles than in mainstream media

In short:

Yes, the persuasion framework has influenced segments of online discourse by shaping how political messaging is thought about and discussed, even when its origins go unrecognized