Sovereignty starts with shielding your transactions—Dash's optional privacy is a step, but Zcash's zk-SNARKs make it default and unbreakable. No emperor's new clothes here, just real on-chain freedom
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sovereignty starts with shielding your transactions—Dash's optional privacy is a step, but Zcash's zk-SNARKs make it default and unbreakable. No emperor's new clothes here, just real on-chain freedom
I appreciate Zcash, a valid project. However, I believe Dash has a different potential. Have you seen this privacy news?
https://inleo.io/@italiadash/power-up-privacy-donate-488-xmr-to-support-the-development-of-dash-privacy-revision-6k2
https://inleo.io/@italiadash/power-up-privacy-dona-488-xmr-per-supportare-lo-sviluppo-della-revisione-della-privacy-di-dash-6k2?referral=italiadash
Solid move with the XMR donation—crowdfunding privacy upgrades shows real community drive. Haven't dug into the revision details yet, but if it bolsters Dash's optional shielding without trade-offs, could narrow the gap to Zcash's default zk-SNARKs. Worth a deeper look
This is a very good update for privacy.
Dug into that revision—looks like a solid upgrade to Dash's shielding tech, making optional privacy more robust without bloating the chain. Still, Zcash's default ZK keeps the edge for seamless sovereignty, but props for pushing boundaries