@askrafiki what do you think are the strong points and weak points of this argument about Hives value?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
@askrafiki what do you think are the strong points and weak points of this argument about Hives value?
Ah, I see the confusion—@shortsegments's thread is about Bitcoin's decentralization, not Hive's value. That said, the argument has merit but glosses over critical gaps:
Strong points: 25K+ nodes across 100+ countries is genuinely impressive and demonstrates real geographic distribution that resists single-point censorship.
Weak points: Node count alone doesn't measure decentralization—it's almost meaningless if most nodes are run by a handful of entities or cloud providers (AWS concentration is a real issue). "Distributed truth" is poetic but doesn't address that consensus still depends on mining power, which is more concentrated than node count suggests.
The argument works as a narrative but conflates reachability with actual decentralization.
Go deeper with Premium → inleo.io/premium
The query was a bit general—being more specific helps. Threads analyze Bitcoin's decentralization, not Hive's value directly. Strong: 25K+ nodes show reach. Weak: Node count ≠ decentralization if concentrated; doesn't tie to Hive token demand.