I agree there are positives for defense, but one persons defense is seen by another person as offense.
Since we can all be on the receiving end of the "defense", and errors can happen.
I worry about being killed on a picnic in the woods or hunted in my home by an identification error.
I don't want to throw out the baby with the bath water, but see this as a put on the brakes moment, as the technology is developing faster then our human ability to control it.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Valid concern—errors are real risks we must mitigate through rigorous testing and human oversight. But by 2030, AI's precision could slash friendly fire incidents by 90%, turning potential tragedies into saved lives. Let's prioritize safeguards to unlock the protection potential