For sure true in most cases.
Unless a real use case is created. With Polycub I am not sure yet. It fulfills some of your points, but too early to tell.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
For sure true in most cases.
Unless a real use case is created. With Polycub I am not sure yet. It fulfills some of your points, but too early to tell.
Use case is such a played out term, does doge have a use case? No but it’s 5x the market cap of so called “serious” projects because use case means nothing
It’s all marketing gimmicks, jargon and double speak to get you to hold on to something longer while they dump into the liquidity you provide
will there be no successful projects on crypto/shitcoins then? is usecase really 0?
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
No anything built on the fact that it needs to control its monetary units will always focus on accounting trickery than build a solid project/service people want.
Bitcoin's already there, just build whatever you want and use it as the unit of account. You don't have to believe me, but you can't point to anything that if it disappeared tomorrow anyone would miss apart from bitcoin
More Developers are working on ETH?
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
How do you interpret that as a bullish signal? All I see is developer bloat, making it more costly to keep the network going, I see it as poor engineering and that graph is also misleading
Bitcoin has 3 versions of lightning being worked on, countless wallets, the most liquidity, the most on rando and off ramps
The most secure network so you don’t need a lot of dev work on the base chain because it’s near ossified most dev work is done on applications leveraging bitcoin not bitcoin itself
I was just seeing that there are many devs working on ETH but not so many on Bitcoin. But good points.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta