There are a lot of people trying to figure out where crypto stands based upon the politics that we see unfolding in the US.
In this video I discuss how none of this matters, directly at least. Some are claiming that Vance, since he owned Bitcoin, could be friendly. To me, there is a more important issue that Vance might bring to the table.
▶️ 3Speak
Seems that way for sure 👍
Its the shadow gov thats really in charge though.
Trump just hammered the EV handouts, helping my short Tesla trade 😎
Interesting vid on the shooting
https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2/240718-MSR-Shot-By-Two-Separate-People-public:3?r=6wkWy61YQrYLrujAP278rtfEaZ9gyMTM
Where does that 40M user number come from? Just out of curiosity...
Wonder how that is figured... It could be like we have 'active' accounts, but it could be 1 dude with 10 accounts kind of thing...
I can guarantee you that Gary was acting on orders the whole time. How can you go from teaching blockchain classes at MIT to all of a sudden be the crypto grinch, then flip his stance in an election year? It's all on orders from above, or below if you think these people are demons, lol.
I guess people are anticipating how fast the support of crypto will be based on the candidates that could be elected. As we've seen with Gensler, the government can try to slow down a lot of the progress. If candidates that are pro-crypto get elected, there is a possibility that approval will be streamlined.