The entire clean energy debate is senseless. Bitcoin miners are about profit. If mining with clean energy reduces their costs, then they are all for it. However, if the price is higher, they will avoid it.
They can relocate to areas where energy is the cheapest.
What is the cost of running the legacy financial network.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
You're perfectly right. I was actually referring to "clean energy" as a behavioral energy, but it's probably my fault for expressing myself poor. The whole narrative of Bitcoin consuming too much energy is total crap, I totally agree on that.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Taking out the banking system will help to offset the energy.
Who needs carbon credits when we can just get it done by closing down all the banks.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
True. Great point.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
agree cause people are after profit and no one will take lose in this but it's it clean energy is cheap and available what would we not use it
If the incentive is there, people will use it. The problem is when it is more costly and it is being forced on people.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
agree there is no point in doing so make it cheap and people will use it and if you force people they will do the opposite to it
No point other than politics and government intervention.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
agree you know about freedom march and how gov is stoping crypto exchange or blocking bank accounts