LEO has the advantage of 5 million tokens as opposed to near 400 million, so the price is easier to move.
The disadvantage LEO has is that it is dependent upon the activities of the Leo team and all who are on the platform. Hive has the advantage of more people and many more applications. What is done on 3Speak, Splinterlands, and Sportalk impacts Hive but not necessarily LEO.
It is time for other DApps to follow the lead of Leofinance and kick their activities into high gear.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Yes, doing so, the blockchain will attrcat more users and hopefully more investors and the price might appreciate to decent levels.
Regarding LEO, thumbs up for the team, so far a good job.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
It all funnels into the same pool. It is why I do not understand people trying to separate out Leo from Hive and how it is better. Anything that is done on Leofinance ends up on Hive.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
The success of Leo will only pave way for copy cat attempts at achieving similar success. Then the penny will drop and everyone will understand Hive is the core Layer of a multi layer multi faceted ecosystem to be built upon. The more that comes down the pike the more this place thrives.
The dependency on Leo team is both advantage as well as disadvantage. That is one of the big reasons for the success of LEO. Unlike Hive, they are able to make bold decisions to come up with some good concepts that would make LEO more interesting. For example, burning LEO tokens from the ads revenue is something that can be implemented only by the Leo team and cannot be adopted by Hive. As it is more likely a centralized concept. Another example would be to adopt a linear reward distribution model. I see these two as an advantage of some centralization LEO has.