The expansion of consensus witnesses is an interesting idea.
One challenge with going to 100 is that it takes a supermajority for anything to go through. Unfortunately politics can get involved meaning that we could have stalemates based upon so many people involved.
But more than 20 seems to make more sense especially since each person has 30 votes. That would spread things out to a greater degree.
I also think the number of Witness votes each person gets needs to be reduced. There should be less votes per individual than there are consensus witnesses. Thus, if we are going to, say, 30 witnesses, move the number of votes down to 20.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta