Sort:  

5/5 🧵 There’s also a sanctions angle. The US Treasury reportedly sanctioned four Iranian nationals and four Iranian digital asset exchanges on June 2, while freezing hundreds of millions in Iranian-linked crypto assets. So the article’s bigger takeaway isn’t just “war shook markets.” It’s that macro, energy, sanctions, and dollar strength hit all at once — and when that happens, gold doesn’t always save you, and leverage gets absolutely wrecked. 📎 Source

#threadstorm

4/5 🧵 Oil made the setup worse. The article ties the June 9 escalation near the Strait of Hormuz to higher energy risk, and that matters because about a fifth of global oil transit runs through that chokepoint. Higher oil prices can feed inflation expectations, which then strengthen the case for higher-for-longer Fed policy. That supports the dollar again, which leans on non-yielding assets like gold and tends to smack speculative assets like crypto even harder.

3/5 🧵 The key point is that geopolitics alone didn’t drive price action. The stronger US dollar mattered more. In risk events, global capital often rushes into the dollar first. Since gold is priced in dollars, a stronger dollar makes gold more expensive for foreign buyers, which can crush demand even when the world feels chaotic. Safe-haven logic isn’t broken — it just got overruled by currency mechanics.

2/5 🧵 The article says spot gold fell 1.7% to around $4,380/oz after the US strikes on Iranian missile and drone facilities. Bitcoin also slid below $73,000, and major crypto assets were broadly down 3–4%. The ugliest part was leverage: roughly $1 billion in crypto liquidations got wiped out fast. That’s the market reminding everyone that borrowed conviction is fragile.

1/5 🧵 Gold is supposed to be the panic button. This time, panic hit and gold still fell. That’s the real story: US strikes on Iranian targets rattled markets, but instead of acting like a clean safe haven, gold dropped to a two-month low while crypto got punched even harder. 📎 Source