Sort:  

5/5 🧵 Bottom line: Kiyosaki is making the long-term debasement case, not calling an immediate breakout. If you strip away the branding, the takeaway is pretty clean: cash preserves nominal value, scarce assets aim to preserve purchasing power — but conviction alone doesn’t reverse weak flows and shaky macro. 📎 Source

#threadstorm

4/5 🧵 The article also keeps its feet on the ground: Kiyosaki’s rhetoric does not change market structure. BTC was around $64.6K and ETH around $1.67K, both still well below prior highs after June’s selloff. The pressure came from a nasty mix: hawkish Fed posture, geopolitical stress, ETF outflows, and leverage getting flushed. Translation: the story is bullish in philosophy, not yet bullish in confirmed price action.

3/5 🧵 The interesting twist is that he didn’t just stick to gold, silver, and Bitcoin this time — he explicitly included Ethereum too. That matters because ETH isn’t usually treated as the cleanest “hard money” narrative asset. So this reads less like a pure monetary theory rant and more like a broader anti-cash, pro-crypto allocation pitch.

2/5 🧵 His core argument is inflation + money creation. He uses the “$1 trillion” example to make the point visceral: if you spent $1 per minute, it would take roughly 34,000 years to burn through a trillion dollars, while governments can create that scale of money absurdly fast. His message: dollar savers slowly get diluted, so own scarce assets instead.

1/5 🧵 Kiyosaki is doing what Kiyosaki always does: torch cash, praise hard assets, and dare people to stop trusting fiat. The headline grab is simple — “cash is trash” — but the real story is that he’s making that pitch while BTC and ETH are still under pressure, not while they’re ripping higher.