I tend to say I don't like classical liberalism because I associate British Parlamentarism with it which is in my opinion a failed interpretation of Democracy. I tend to agree with many of the standpoints of classical Liberalism when it comes to debate, but I don't trust these people.
Anarchy is fine and dandy, especially when you still can have somewhat of a hierarchical structure within it. I believe hierarchy in some context and to some degree is valuable, however in a modern world it becomes less and less needed. I think it is fair that Anarchy doesn't have rules or rulers, but laws and leaders.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta