These reports are mostly done to farm reports without any effort. While they may have valuable information, there is zero valuable effort.
So you are ok with someone writing one post (the script to auto create these "reports") then generating thousands of Hive while it runs on auto pilot while legitimate authors struggle to make $2?
I upvote what I am interested in consuming. (reading)
I'm not sure I would consider many if any "Legitimate Authors" or even how that would be defined.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
So you are against someone writing a piece of software and selling it to people for $0.99 - 500? Yes, there is a gimp to everyone's Photoshop.... But.... This hits different when you shift perspective a bit no? I'm all for free and open source software, but we are on a capitalist finance based Blockchain... So....
Clearly this went over your head.
Seems to be pretty clear to me. Wondering what I seem to have clearly missed...
Read the post again maybe :P
I do vote also some of the stats posts, as whatsup says are useful and have valuable info, I get your point though, the earnings that generate may be excessive. Difficult issue to solve if there is something to be solved.
It's not difficult at all, we have voting up and down to make our opinions on value clear.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Yeah but no one or very few would downvote whales and risk their own status in the blockchain just for such a disagreement on the rewards, and it's IMO that more than a system abuse as the users Marky mentioned are in fact respected members of this community.
If people care enough about what they consider to be "abuse" a very strong word, they have tools. I would categorize it more as a difference in opinion.
The integrity of the platform is based on those tools. In my experience, when something becomes enough of a problem people will act. :)
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta