I got told by @savvyplayer to simply curate the posts (instead of comments) of Hive authors I like to engage with, so that even if the #dustsweeper bot doesn't sweep all my outgoing (as well as incoming) dust votes (despite having enough balance), both I and my favorite authors benefit from my dust votes (without relying much on dust collecting services). 🤓
That would be a perfect thing to doz sometimes the authors prefer the Upvote on their blog instead, one of my friends told me to save my Upvotes on his comment for his blog instead
That's not an uncommon preference for maximizing author/curator rewards, especially by Hive users who use neither the #dustsweeper or #dustbunnydust-collecting service. 🤓
If the curator can vote significantly above $0.02 per vote, then he or she is free to vote on comments instead of posts without losing the value of the votes to dust. 🤓
It needs to sweep as many dust votes as possible (to Hive users having enough dust sweeping balance), hopefully without draining its Voting Power. 🤓
got it brother
I got told by @savvyplayer to simply curate the posts (instead of comments) of Hive authors I like to engage with, so that even if the #dustsweeper bot doesn't sweep all my outgoing (as well as incoming) dust votes (despite having enough balance), both I and my favorite authors benefit from my dust votes (without relying much on dust collecting services). 🤓
!HUG
I sent 1.0 HUG on behalf of @savvytester.
(1/3)
That would be a perfect thing to doz sometimes the authors prefer the Upvote on their blog instead, one of my friends told me to save my Upvotes on his comment for his blog instead
That's not an uncommon preference for maximizing author/curator rewards, especially by Hive users who use neither the #dustsweeper or #dustbunny dust-collecting service. 🤓
!WINEX !LUV
Absolutely right I think that's better
If the curator can vote significantly above $0.02 per vote, then he or she is free to vote on comments instead of posts without losing the value of the votes to dust. 🤓
!WEED !BEER