I am aware of dog latin, but not fluent in it, nor am I aware of any apps like Preply or schools like the Alliance Francaise that might teach me it. I do not understand sire name/surname effect at law, but grasp the concept that using a specific symbol or not can enter you into a system or not, such as the password to enter a speakeasy, or access to an account, such as the valued-customer account. So I grasp that using a symbol that mimics my actual name can enter me into jurisdiction of the land piracy that has replaced lawful governments on Earth.
The language of Babylon title reminds me that Khumric, which became Welsh, is claimed by some to be the language Egyptian Heiroglyphics represents in symbols. This seems a fantastic rabbit hole that might prove illustrative of how some of these legal machinations were devised. As I am not a linguist I have not plunged into that dark study, but your knowledge of languages far outshines mine, and you seem more familiar by far as well with the JD materials, so might find Khumric interesting.
Edit: I replied to the pre-edited comment, after which you added much.
"...as long as we keep the backdoor open, we are not nationals of our land; we have sided with the occupying forces of our land..."
This is indeed problematic. However the fact we are deceived deliberately from birth and are prevented from knowing the true obligations we undertake by so doing, lawfully and justly nullifies any such implied contract. The requirement that contracts specify the obligations signatories thereto undertake is violated by the deception intended to prevent us from understanding the actual obligations demanded of us. This is not lawful in the least.
That doesn't matter, of course, if it's able to be done. In the final analysis our rights are not negotiable. They aren't privileges. No contract, even should we be fully informed of it's effect, is able to dispense with our inherent rights, which are something we are comprised of, like our blood and guts. We are able to be coerced, even killed, by brigands, and we better be able to defend ourselves regardless of contracts, deception, or any power whatsoever, or we will be subjugated in durance vile.
Taxation is theft. Property is an expression of our will, and only brigands seek our property through subjugation. This is the essence of the common law, the law of nature, of God, if you will. Enormous and inordinate complexity has been employed in the imposition of such brigandry to steal our property, and regardless of every symbolic deceit, is contrary to the bare fact of our inherent and inalienable rights to our property, our lives, and our right to defend them from theft.
We have no less right to defend ourselves than dogs, and dogs will defend their lives. If we can not, then we are less than dogs, and that is blatantly not true. Whatever the claims of our deceivers seeking to reduce us to chattel, our sovereignty isn't imperiled. Our natural right to defend us from depredation can only end with our lives. Whether we exercise our rights successfully or not is a different matter, subject to negotiation and trial.
We may profit by surmounting their tricks to prevent their depredations by their conjured pretense of authority, but it's a pretense and no such authority exists. Power does exist, and that is a horse of a different color. Facing the reality that the people are deceived and schlep to courts to deliver their property when demanded, and neither will defend us from that expectation, it seems far preferable to employ such legal machinations to defend us rather than resorting to force of arms without the support of the militia of free men.
We are not constrained to do so. We are not required to be wise or have understanding to have rights. We are sovereign whether we can express it or not. We ARE our rights, and whether we are smart or not, whether we are strong or not, this can't be changed about us - even if we are convinced of it. Clearly it is better to succeed to defend our rights with ballots than to fail with bullets; to win in a contest of words rather than lose in a war at arms, and you are wise to seek to do so, if only because should we lose with words we are not prevented from winning with war. However the reverse is not true, and if we fall in the field there will be no further contest: all our property will be taken from our cold, dead fingers, over our dead bodies.