DHF should be able to fund multiple operations such as HiveSQL and it should have done it. Else we are going to have very fragile infrastructure for HIVE. Nodes being decentralized is not going to be enough. Building antifragile infrastructure benefits everyone on HIVE.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It's my impression it is expected HAF will be used more throughout the ecosystem. And dApp devs are waiting for Blocktrades to come out with its first tools to have more working examples of how to use HAF.
I am not familiar with the backend of HAF. If it leads to multiple parties creating their own SQL databases, it could be great! If we are simply replacing one centralized service with another, it may not be sufficient. Either way this is progress. HIVE will grow even stronger after this.
From my understanding of it, it will lead to multiple HAF databases. Probably there will be some public services, but with a low limit that would exclude their usage by big dApps.
This is very good. I think it could lead to DAPPs creating their own HAF databases that could be made available to others in an emergency situation. Thank you very much for the details.
That's my thinking, but we will see if that's the way we are heading or not.