You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Crypto needs regulation but not a centralized type

in LeoFinance11 months ago

Ps: your point on disagreement that basic income is a good thing imo goes against blochain and tokenization.

Because:

If these systems are understood to NEED some capital (to transact) then that's not a good start....even if through RC (which is essentially a limited trial)... users get a "free" pass. Any significant utility will need a user to pay fees.

So then... YES, THERE MUST BE A BASIC OUTPUT for users that interact with the network in creative ways.

It's completely parasitic to think a network can exist that is essentially PAY TO PLAY but then no incremental rewards for users that comit and stay loyal to the network.

And worse: he only working model for rewards.. BLOGGING... is subjectively administers.. AND POLICED by clowns.

Then when people see that actually.... Rewards are really BLIND VOTERS... all potential hits a wall by people that exercise lateral thinking.

So again... no one sees that and feels they're missing out. Other than the audiences that are already here.

In reality this is a microcosm of the state of the world. A few elite well off. The rest are WORKERS for a miniscule output.