I read his post, there was in my view absolutely no reason to down vote it, other than the simple fact of what the post content was about. Other people may have differing view and see something that I missed that would constitute a valid reason for a down vote.
Disagreement should be expressed with words, not downvotes.
At least the ability to lay down such a huge downvote by a single entity should be addressed (eliminated or capped?) Any down-vote should be nullified if such individual or group fails to 'comment' with their reasoning at the time the negative vote is cast; IMO.
I read his post, there was in my view absolutely no reason to down vote it, other than the simple fact of what the post content was about. Other people may have differing view and see something that I missed that would constitute a valid reason for a down vote.
At least the ability to lay down such a huge downvote by a single entity should be addressed (eliminated or capped?) Any down-vote should be nullified if such individual or group fails to 'comment' with their reasoning at the time the negative vote is cast; IMO.