It comes down to how one manages one's own private property rights. So, if you were in a hypothetical public town square somewhere either online or offline, the theory would be that you therefore give up some of your rights when entering such a square but to what extent is the active debate. I say it really depends on the rules of whatever square you are in at any given moment.
Public Squares
Square meaning not just a physical location but a contract between parties. So, it really depends on the terms of the covenant between parties. We would have to break that down piece by piece to figure it out. That could take a while. But if you were on your own land and I say something you don't like, then in some ways I have no free speech in your house in the sense that you can ask me to leave for anything I say or do.
Having Exclusive Rights
Not saying you should but my argument is that you should have the right to kick me out of your house at any time for any reason or for no reasons at all. But then again, it depends on the contract between 2 people. So, it is a 2-way street. But that is only if there is a contract between 2 parties.
Outside of Contracts
But apart from a contract or union, you could say I have no freedom of speech at your house at all and that you can do what you want and can have me removed off your property. Not that you necessarily should but that you have the freedom and right to do so depending on the details.
Rights vs Contracts
But at the same time, when you exercise your private property rights to remove me off your property for anything I say or don't say, you might then be breaching, violating, and forfeiting contracts or agreements between me and you for example. So, most often, a person has to juggle and decide whether to honor contracts or rights. So, in other words, you may have the right to do something but doing so could violate covenants between other humans. If you have power to exercise your ownership rights, you may have the right to do so at the cost of destroying social contracts between men and you have to decide constantly which to prioritize at any given moment in life, contracts or rights.
Private Property Rights:
It comes down to how one manages one's own private property rights. So, if you were in a hypothetical public town square somewhere either online or offline, the theory would be that you therefore give up some of your rights when entering such a square but to what extent is the active debate. I say it really depends on the rules of whatever square you are in at any given moment.
Public Squares
Square meaning not just a physical location but a contract between parties. So, it really depends on the terms of the covenant between parties. We would have to break that down piece by piece to figure it out. That could take a while. But if you were on your own land and I say something you don't like, then in some ways I have no free speech in your house in the sense that you can ask me to leave for anything I say or do.
Having Exclusive Rights
Not saying you should but my argument is that you should have the right to kick me out of your house at any time for any reason or for no reasons at all. But then again, it depends on the contract between 2 people. So, it is a 2-way street. But that is only if there is a contract between 2 parties.
Outside of Contracts
But apart from a contract or union, you could say I have no freedom of speech at your house at all and that you can do what you want and can have me removed off your property. Not that you necessarily should but that you have the freedom and right to do so depending on the details.
Rights vs Contracts
But at the same time, when you exercise your private property rights to remove me off your property for anything I say or don't say, you might then be breaching, violating, and forfeiting contracts or agreements between me and you for example. So, most often, a person has to juggle and decide whether to honor contracts or rights. So, in other words, you may have the right to do something but doing so could violate covenants between other humans. If you have power to exercise your ownership rights, you may have the right to do so at the cost of destroying social contracts between men and you have to decide constantly which to prioritize at any given moment in life, contracts or rights.