Again, I agree.
But that isn't communism, that free markets.
The most efficient manageable groups with thrive, the others wither.
No force required. The beauty of the market.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Again, I agree.
But that isn't communism, that free markets.
The most efficient manageable groups with thrive, the others wither.
No force required. The beauty of the market.
It is communism, you have just been miseducated to keep you from seeing the door out of your slavery.
If you are using money, you are a slave of whoever determines the value of that money.
Better we set a minimum, and accolades for those that exceed them.
https://archive.org/details/lookingbackward01bellgoog
That book makes a good outline.
Each group will have to find their own optimum.
It is not communism, you've just been miseducated to keep you from seeing the free market logic, from the ideology.
If you are using money, you are a slave of whoever determines the value of that money.
Only if central banking is used -(they determine value and supply, and so not connected to price discovery - which is what free markets need to function)...
Central banking is socialism through the back door.
...groups finding optimums relies of true price discovery.
Yep, we don't need men in suits ordering us around as to what we are allowed to do, imo.
100% agreed.
The bureaucrats can go for a long walk off a short pier....