Any sources originating from 'the establishment are to be looked at with maximum suspicion (imo).
That cover 90% of information.
I'm now leaning to the fact it doesn't exist at all! The biggest false flag in history.
(based on doctors interviews who disagree.)
Here's the full video that I grabbed clips from, for my vid the other day, as an example.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XxeGUIBPVleu/
Never mind.
When the WHO lie using their own figures to create a narrative ( panic), you don't start to smell a rat?
#Seriously?
I am not quoting the WHO. If you don't discriminate between the WHO and actual scientists that publish the results of their experiments after other scientists that compete with them for funding review their work (peer review), you are hopelessly incapable of making rational decisions. Science is real information. The WHO are lying mouthpieces for banksters.
See the difference? These links are what the WHO omits from their discussions, along with the enemedia, and government. That's why I post them.
The difference between facts and lies is the difference between peer reviewed science and political statements.
I thought you capable of grasping that difference. If you cannot I have wasted every moment I have spent discussing this matter with you.
...don't be a dick, seriously.
The Corbett report...you might find this interesting....
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bM9aZflBoOU/
Great stuff - sheeple are much scarier than an imaginary virus...