You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: MAGNUM MYSTERIUM

in LOGICZOMBIE4 years ago (edited)

They say there are these old tablets, like stones, with what may be a list of reigns of these ancient kings or creatures or gods or whatever, each lasting around 30,000 years each or many thousands of years, something like a few dozens of these giant monarchs. Is it possible that these ancient myths, legends, fables, or whatever they may be, could they be completely or partly accurate? Were some of them Egyptian Pharaohs?

Less Than a Billion Maybe

I say it is possible that earth is over ten thousand years old at the youngest. I want to believe that the earth is less than a billion years old and possibly under a million years old. But I don't really know because I was not there. So, I will not say it is a certain age.

Sort:  

Why would you hazard a guess at the age of the earth being "less than a billion" if you believe this question is beyond your epistemological limit?

Stones are notoriously difficult to accurately date, but I find the idea of a "civilization" more than 10,000 years old intriguing.

same thing can be said in reverse

Because of stars.

And the movement of stars.

And the speed of light.

You are ignoring higher dimensions. You are ignoring the possibilities and potential theorized by scientists regarding what these other dimensions may be able to do in regards to folding and bending space, the three main dimensions, and time, the fourth dimension, on top of other possible dimensions. Outside of that, are you certain how big and far away stars may be or are you only guessing.

We only know what we can observe and measure empirically.

Speculation is fun, but we must be careful not to conflate the hypothetical with the actual.

Evolution is speculation.

It's a hypothesis with demonstrable efficacy.