Person (b) says, well, it's difficult to describe my table but it is waaaay better than yours, so yours is wrong. I saw a table like your once and it was so dangerous it fell over and killed a bunch of people and made babies cry. (false dichotomy, emotional appeal, bald assertion, strawman, affirming the consequent, and argumentum ad baculum).
I don’t know what you’re referencing to with this,
Probably when you (indirectly) suggested the only alternative to your table is NIHILISM.
And everybody knows NIHILISM killed a bunch of people and makes babies cry.