to be able to vote you should have to prove your identity on an ap like https://voatz.com which is MIT blockchain certficied system, we have ti use multiple blockchains to actually secure this system and trump can make executive orders to SECURE THE ELECTION ON A FEDERAL LEVEL
NO ONE CAN STOP the SECURING of an election..... when we make new rules protocals to make it SAFER< arguing against it becomes criminal, you reveal your intentions to want an illegal private secret bal,ot which is against our constitution
ballots MUST be FAIR OPEN TRANSPARENT we must be able to see EXACTLY WHO VOTED FOR WHAT on a blocckhain, with BATCHES that CANT be faked, individual privacy will eb respected but you cant HIDE who voetd for what from ANYONE certified to become a CHEKCER and ANYONE wil be able to check
for example i had to sign documents and promsie notr to misurse a massive stack of data i wa shgiven when i voluntered for Kucinish in 2004 and i got access to data on every voter in SD a big map of every house was printed ouit showing whose D and whose R and even oetrh parties lol
but we saw the map, and we can actually prove who voted for whjo and they can prove, with math, there was election fraud
thjeer was no way biden would have won if we had a REAL election, but many states liek california illegally created an executive order to make our entrie election a MAIL IN election when we had no infrastructure to support that
it was like something from belarus and must be challenged with a recall
You keep jumping to conclusions based on individual court dates. Just because 1 of the Fraud claims was denied by the supreme court, doesn't mean the other types of vote fraud that are alleged are some how wrapped up and its a closed case...
They haven't even finished documenting all the evidence, which is a very clear fact in all the non bias media.
Twenty-six of the House’s 203 members are co-sponsoring the resolution so far.
Mastriano is the name you will want to watch, who ever the goof was in the article you mentioned was not the right Republican to watch, it was misleading of NBC to reference such a weak case.
HIVE!D
I for one APPRECIATE your coverage of this on the BLOCK!
to be able to vote you should have to prove your identity on an ap like https://voatz.com which is MIT blockchain certficied system, we have ti use multiple blockchains to actually secure this system and trump can make executive orders to SECURE THE ELECTION ON A FEDERAL LEVEL
NO ONE CAN STOP the SECURING of an election..... when we make new rules protocals to make it SAFER< arguing against it becomes criminal, you reveal your intentions to want an illegal private secret bal,ot which is against our constitution
ballots MUST be FAIR OPEN TRANSPARENT we must be able to see EXACTLY WHO VOTED FOR WHAT on a blocckhain, with BATCHES that CANT be faked, individual privacy will eb respected but you cant HIDE who voetd for what from ANYONE certified to become a CHEKCER and ANYONE wil be able to check
for example i had to sign documents and promsie notr to misurse a massive stack of data i wa shgiven when i voluntered for Kucinish in 2004 and i got access to data on every voter in SD a big map of every house was printed ouit showing whose D and whose R and even oetrh parties lol
but we saw the map, and we can actually prove who voted for whjo and they can prove, with math, there was election fraud
thjeer was no way biden would have won if we had a REAL election, but many states liek california illegally created an executive order to make our entrie election a MAIL IN election when we had no infrastructure to support that
it was like something from belarus and must be challenged with a recall
https://t.me/eoscalifornia https://eoscalifornia.org
Blockchains are the future of consensus for sure!
In other news, President-Elect Biden will be sworn in on January 20th.
In President Trumps words,
"A lot will happen between now and the 20th, of January" "We could be counting votes for 2 years, but it may end up in the supreme court, we will see"
Trump is lying to himself; it doesn't mean we have to believe those lies.
No, we won't be counting votes for two years.
No a judge ruled on this, you're lying to yourself. This was a confusing election.
https://peakd.com/hive-172447/@phusionphil/judge-blocks-certification-of-pennsylvania-election-results-trump-grants-flynn-full-pardon-or-ntd/
The judge who has already been overruled by the state’s Supreme Court?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/pennsylvania-high-court-throws-out-challenge-mail-ballots-n1249240
It’s getting hard to keep track of how many times Trump’s losing.
You keep jumping to conclusions based on individual court dates. Just because 1 of the Fraud claims was denied by the supreme court, doesn't mean the other types of vote fraud that are alleged are some how wrapped up and its a closed case...
https://www.ntd.com/pennsylvania-senator-mounting-evidence-shows-election-was-compromised_534112.html
They haven't even finished documenting all the evidence, which is a very clear fact in all the non bias media.
Mastriano is the name you will want to watch, who ever the goof was in the article you mentioned was not the right Republican to watch, it was misleading of NBC to reference such a weak case.
You don't think it's odd that it always seems to be the next ruling that will blow things open?
We're only 16 days away from the Electoral College voting.
It’s sad/amusing how many Trumpists have convinced themselves that SCOTUS will ride to the rescue.