SEC's Confusing Stance

in Cent5 months ago (edited)

Another big development in the crypto world. After the success of Bitcoin ETF, we are told that the SEC has finally approved the Ethereum ETF. Moreover, we are also informed that even the Bloomberg analysts were shocked by a sudden shift in the SEC’s stance. Though I don’t fully understand the content of the FIT 21 bill, what is clear to me is that it aims to clarify the roles of both the SEC and the CFTC when it comes to regulating digital assets. This move has received support from Congress and the White House. Source

Many experts in the crypto sector interpret the recent approval of the SEC as an implicit recognition that ETH is not a security. However, Scott Johnson, a finance lawyer has a different point of view. For him, the SEC did not explicitly confirm ETH's non-security status in its approval order. Instead, it decided to evade the issue. Source

Reflecting on the above two articles plus this one, I learned one important insight and observed one interesting thing concerning the stance of SEC when it comes to crypto.

As for the new learning, I realized the important role of the Howey Test in identifying whether a particular cryptocurrency is considered a security or not. The test provides four criteria to determine if a transaction is considered an investment contract: investment of money, common enterprise, expectation of profits, and efforts of others.

Among these four elements, the second and the fourth are not clear to me. By “common enterprise," it means that the expected profit of the investor is connected with those of either the promoter of the project or other investors. As for the “efforts of others,” the same expected profit must come primarily from the efforts of a third party or a promoter.

Regarding that interesting aspect related to the stance of the SEC, I observe that what this regulating body hates in crypto is the idea of staking where holders can earn passive income. In the eyes of the SEC, such financial capability of cryptocurrency can be classified as an investment contract.

References:

SEC Approves Spot ETHEREUM ETFS

SEC’s ETF decision means ETH and ’a lot’ of other tokens are not securities

Hong Kong SFC considers allowing Ether staking for ETF issuers

Sort:  

Bureaucrats trying to apply old laws to new technology doesn't keep us safe, it just stifles innovation and thwarts progress as we try to escape the mess they built to ensnare us in the first place.

Precisely! It is sickening to hear their alibis that they are doing this in the name of public service and protection.

!PIZZA

!LUV

PIZZA!

$PIZZA slices delivered:
@rzc24-nftbbg(1/5) tipped @jacobtothe

Congratulations @rzc24-nftbbg! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You made more than 20000 comments.
Your next target is to reach 21000 comments.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out our last posts:

Hive Power Up Day - June 1st 2024