The trick, I've found, is learning to distinguish those who have merely been misled and have developed a habit of parroting flawed talking points from those who have a vested interest in shielding their ideas from criticism. In other words, one must know the difference between the merely ignorant and the intellectually dishonest.
Schoolboy error! - tar them all with the same brush, it makes for a much happier blogger.
...you might enjoy the latest post I've just done...you'll get it...
https://peakd.com/hive-150329/@lucylin/you-cant-be-heard-screaming-in-space-but-farting-in-cyber-space-will-be-heard
Due to the very sycophantic nature of this reply, I'll upvote you!...lol.
Facepalm
Bloody hell, you're right! It's been almost a year since a last wrote a proper editorial, and all because I made the mistake of trying to be nuanced in my last long-winded rebuttal to a dumbass Trotskiist. Who am I kidding, nuance never solved a blasted thing, it doesn't work on people who think in black and white! After all, said Trotskiist I was arguing with said he had no intention of "wasting time reading" what I had to say!
I don't know why I even try being nice. It's never worked for me.
The inevitable (and painful) destination, of attempting to use logic and reason with people who posses neither...
...and another upvote for continued sycophancy ! lololol
If only you could see the expression on my face or hear the tone of my voice. You have me laughing me arse off! Enough, I need to wake up early tomorrow.
I do webcamming services at a very reasonable rate...