Lies again - you see why they need to appeal and prove correct behavior @chrisrice ?
cc: @hivewatchers
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Lies again - you see why they need to appeal and prove correct behavior @chrisrice ?
cc: @hivewatchers
Outcome:
What is that?! You are searching for something which isn't there. But that proofs you are not a bot.
@keys-defender @hivewatchers any update? any?
@chrisrice
Hmm, yeah, I read @keys-defender's comments to see if there was any merit, but it doesn't look like the same picture
If not, please post an apology on https://d.buzz, @keys-defender, once per day, asking for @podewils forgiveness, and for 21 days
Posted via D.Buzz
You’re worse than the scammers you hide in your community. That’s a zoom of his own picture. It’s a painting and obviously he is not the author.
What kind of keys are you defending?
If it's "obvious" he's not the author I guess you have a link to the original art piece?
I didn't see that, and that's what I'm asking for . from what I understand, that is one of the requirements needed before flagging?
Posted via D.Buzz
Okay, some of your true colors are coming out now.
How is that "worse" than being a scammer? Isn't it standard protocol to ask for the source link?
Posted via D.Buzz
How about you do your job and Google it? It’s your community and it’s obvious that it’s not his.
If he proves to me that that’s his signature and he is a professional painter that just happened to plagiarize all his previous posts then I’ll publish an apology per day for the next 1000 days? Deal? Lol
Ah okay, so that blurry zoomed in section of the image is a signature that was blurred out?
If you are saying that the signature was blurred out, to hide the original artist, that would make sense . . but I don't see a signature there.
Posted via D.Buzz
Ummm providing evidence for your accusations is YOUR JOB, not mine.
Doesn't make sense to start calling people scammers & worse than scammers, just bcoz they asked for evidence
Posted via D.Buzz
You are a fucking idiot...
PROOF!
That is so small. I can only see artefacts. Are you sure you compare the right pictures?
Can you provide a link of the source please?
I'd be very happy if you were involved in our community, reporting things that you think are forms of abuse . . the words you choose aren't so bad, but be sure to have evidence
Posted via D.Buzz
Thank you for tagging me @keys-defender
If we do that, it's a mistake, and I'm onboard with you there . . what is this a picture of though?
Posted via D.Buzz
If you do have proof of someone lying, you can let me know by tagging me.
I think the best of people but it includes an inherent weaknesses . . it is more of a strength than a weakness though imo.
Posted via D.Buzz
Keep 'em coming boy. Keep 'em coming.
ok :)
Those pictures don't look the same at all?
Posted via D.Buzz
Are you drunk? It’s a zoom of his picture LOL
“There isn’t a worst blind than someone who does not want to see, hu”?
It looks like now you’re even defending intellectual thieves...
I see that it's a zoom but I don't understand what's wrong with it?
What about the zoomed in view indicates that the image is not his?
Posted via D.Buzz
Thanks for dealing with this at all. I guess we shall close it and move on.
It looks like @keys-defender was right, and that you Buzzed an art piece created by someone else, while claiming it was your own 😐
Posted via D.Buzz
In this thread?
Good.
Yeah, I am serious about adding value, and when disagree. it's not to:
I mainly disagree with the form of communication @hivewatchers, @logic and now you use.
Posted via D.Buzz
You are high, mate. Get real.
🤷
What a fucking crazy fucking twat this one is...